• MotoAsh@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    You must be new to capitalism.

    CEOs are extremely replacable. The one thing that differentiates a good CEO from a bad one is how much they STFU and let the actual workers do their job instead of shoving directives down everyones’ throat every time a shiny new waste of an ‘investment’ catches their eye like AI.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not all CEOs are equally good or bad. Some help the company to be better, others are better at ruining it. Replaceable does not mean that ANYONE can do the job. You completely ignored my point.

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        So you’re saying Ubisoft execs aren’t inept morons seeking the latest money-grubbing trends?

        I hate to break it to you, but yes: Anyone can replace that kind of executive.

        Could a random Joe replace the “executive” in a five man team? Probably not. Though any other scenario, it becomes more and more plausible. The bigger a company gets, the less competent the suits are. It’s basically a law of capitalism these days.

        • CybranM@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I don’t think they’re talking about Ubi specifically. I agree that CEOs are “easily” replaceable but I also agree that some people would do a better job than others

          • MotoAsh@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            That’s true of any position ever. Just because some would be great doesn’t mean the entire group cannot be far below average.