Looks like the Ghostrunner developers also have an issue with paid mods running off their IP.

  • justastranger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    20 hours ago

    They do need permission from the building owner to bring people inside to look at it though. And that usually involves paying them.

    • jaselle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yes but in this context, the building owner is the person who bought the game.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It would be like the architect who drew the plans for your home getting a court order to seize your home because you installed extra cabinets that were not on his plans.

        • Magiilaro@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          In germany we have the “Architektenurheberrecht”.

          Architectural copyright (Architektenurheberrecht) protects an architect’s original intellectual and creative achievements, including designs, plans, and completed buildings, provided they possess a sufficient level of originality (Schöpfungshöhe).

          Architects can, and have, use this to deny changes to such buildings or claim injunctive relief, removal of the infringement, or financial damages.

          Installing extra cabinets would most likely not be enough to seize the house, but if he can convince a judge that it will sufficient change his art he could get a order to have them removed and the original space restored again.

          Not sure if this is germany only, but it shows that every bullshit is possible when it comes to laws.

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 minutes ago

            I’m surprised and also not really.

            It’s exactly the same line of thinking where someone else is given more rights over a thing than the person who owns it.

        • jaselle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yeah exactly. It’s crazy that people think it’s OK for game developers to have a say in what mods you can apply to your own legally purchased game.

          • Magiilaro@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            They don’t say anything against applying or installing the mod to the game, at least not in this case, but against making money with their IP. This should not be mixed together.