• cmhe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Well, it shouldn’t be carbon neutral… It should used to get carbon out of the atmosphere and into a less damaging substance.

    Carbon capture does not replace getting rid of our dependency on burning fossil fuels.

    We wouldn’t get back the same amount that we are burning anyway. So this approach is worse, because dumb people think it would save us, without us changing the way we produce energy.

    It is worse, because it is a distraction from actually doing something.