very_well_lost@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agoDuckDuckGo poll says 90% responders don't want AIwww.pcworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square210fedilinkarrow-up11.45K
arrow-up11.45Kexternal-linkDuckDuckGo poll says 90% responders don't want AIwww.pcworld.comvery_well_lost@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square210fedilink
minus-squaremechoman444@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·3 hours agoOkay, so that’s not what the article says. It says that 90% of respondents don’t want AI search. Moreover, the article goes into detail about how DuckDuckGo is still going to implement AI anyway. Seriously, titles in subs like this need better moderation. The title was clearly engineered to generate clicks and drive engagement. That is not how journalism should function.
minus-squareLobsterJim@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·51 minutes agoUnless I’m mistaken this title is generated to match the title at the link. Are you saying the mods should update titles to accurately reflect the content of the articles posted?
minus-squareTom Arrr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 minutes agoAlso, Duck Duck Go is a search engine. What other ai would it do?
Okay, so that’s not what the article says. It says that 90% of respondents don’t want AI search.
Moreover, the article goes into detail about how DuckDuckGo is still going to implement AI anyway.
Seriously, titles in subs like this need better moderation.
The title was clearly engineered to generate clicks and drive engagement. That is not how journalism should function.
Unless I’m mistaken this title is generated to match the title at the link. Are you saying the mods should update titles to accurately reflect the content of the articles posted?
Also, Duck Duck Go is a search engine. What other ai would it do?