• billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Yeah the vehicle is great. Lots of room, good acceleration…

    But Mustang? Come on it’s a fucking crossover. To put that and this beast…

    in the same category is a freaking sacrilege.

    • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      I see this comparison a lot and wonder why they feel that the E is the terrible departure from the muscle-bound model when this existed decades prior.

      image

      • excursion22@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        The whole 3rd (1980-1993) and especially the 4th (1994-2004) gen Mustangs were pretty mediocre looking.

        • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          You’re absolutely right. Just like every other model out there, this one has had some egregious missteps in design over the decades. The e is hardly the first time that the badge was used on a vehicle that didn’t sit well with the fans.