not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 15 hours agoed postinglemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1285file-text
arrow-up1285imageed postinglemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 15 hours agomessage-square43fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresping@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-28 hours agoI f’ing love emacs, but don’t get cocky. It’s a security disaster. Well, if you use any packages fetched from the net anyway.
minus-squaredylanmorgan@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoI was being like 99% facetious and the 1% serious has more to do with how eMacs updates are distributed as compared to Notepad++. To your point, any non-vetted packages would be a huge source of risk, and even vetted packages should be monitored.
eMacs wasn’t compromised!
I f’ing love emacs, but don’t get cocky. It’s a security disaster.
Well, if you use any packages fetched from the net anyway.
All of our modern infrastructure is.
Fair point
I was being like 99% facetious and the 1% serious has more to do with how eMacs updates are distributed as compared to Notepad++. To your point, any non-vetted packages would be a huge source of risk, and even vetted packages should be monitored.