• Epp4@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Mormons took that and really ran with it, as their a “Doctrine & Covenants” are much more blatant in support of rape. Joseph Smith told Emma Hale that God would destroy her for refusing to marry him.

    • Cruel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      How do they support rape? Or do you consider it rape of I tell I woman she’ll go to hell if she doesn’t consent?

      • Epp4@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Because in D&C 132:54, Emma is threatened with destruction if she refuses. That’s called rape by duress.

        • Cruel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I believe they were already married for many years before that. The threat of destruction was if she didn’t stay loyal to him in their marriage. She’s specially mentioned because she was consistently against polygamy, so this is more accurately described as intimidation to stay married. It’s a stretch to say it supports rape, no more than marriage itself is a social/legal pressure for those married to have sex with each other.

          • Epp4@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            They were not, and that’s not what it says, but you’re welcome to twist it however you like to believe differently - same as people do with the Bible.

            If someone came up to your mom/sister/daughter and said “There’s a hidden sniper with his rifle trained on you right now. Marry me and stay loyal, or else he’ll shoot you” then you wouldn’t consider that to be rape? I most certainly would. Whenever you threaten someone with violence for refusing a sexual relationship, that is rape.