Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If nobody in Europe paid for Google products think of the economic benefit to Europe if all that saved cash was then spent by the people on European products and services.

    • Stiggyman@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The last one I am actively paying for is YouTube premium. I don’t think there is a good alternative yet…

      Either the alternative has critical features missing

      Or they are not loud enough to have people crosspost to it

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        Using channel URLs as RSS feeds + yt-dlp means i don’t even visit the site (when i do uBlock Origin does wonders on Firefox).

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I feel you’re trying to oppose the decision and your arguments against it are all valid for the current system 😂.

        What landlords are you talking about?

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          All of them. They’re parasites.

          And I’m not opposed to ditching US tech, quite the opposite, but let’s not pretend it ends with a load of spare money for Europe because trickle up economics is real and it just ends in our own billionaires having it all, who’ll just invest it all in US tech stocks anyway…