• Johanno@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    France is heavily subsiding nuclear power.

    Without it, it would be the most expensive one.

    I am all in for nuclear power, as long as it is waaaaay cheaper than it is right now.

    Even buying the uranium is today more expensive than building a solar plant. (compared to resources per power generation)

    • Johanno@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Additionally, why it is stupid to build new nuclear plants (keep the old ones as long as the maintenance is not too high).

      If you now decide you need 1 GW in 10 years Then you can plan your nuclear power plant and start to build it. However as we know it will now take 30 years to build it and costs 10 times as much, while your demand is now 4 GW.

      Also what do you do in the meantime? Hope that the power is enough for 10 years?

      Nuclear is expensive, not scalable, and takes way too long to build.

      It is pretty safe. Especially new reactors. Also the atomic waste should be recycled in different nuclear reactors, which can use it as fuel, but those are still in research.