This is really missing the forest for the trees. Even outlets that actually do have solid geopolitical commentary but advocate for the same path Green Party, PSL, etc are telling people that if they go out and loudly announce their beliefs then reforms will materialize out of thin air. Novara explicitly runs cover for genocide. 972mag and Al Jazeera tier IMO. So yeah on par with Zeteo. Christ I forgot about Mehdi Hasan I’ve had his stuff blocked for so long.

My issue is more structural than “do these people give me stuff I can occassionally copy-and-paste without everyone getting mad” – they use that stuff to accrue credibility, and the US media apparatus uses that credibility to spread premises which are more important than people objecting or supporting blatantly unpopular moves. Besides, they hit the same notes repeatedly to the point of being noise. Generally they just repost the NYT and say “wow this headline is hypocritical”. Like yeah of course it is, traditional outlets like that have no purchase with regular people. That’s why they need liberals who complain about the editorial practices of orgs they are half a chili too spicy for to keep them in the loop.

Not being super familiar with Chomsky because I never cared for him, but IS he even a leftist? Afaik his thing is about non-materialist individualism, which seems suspiciously neolib. In the modern post-neoliberal context, I think we can mostly all agree that individualism and socialism are in direct conflict, despite the economic liberation of socialism being required for individual economic freedom. In the feudal stage of capitalism we have returned to since the 90’s I would argue Chomsky, based on my limited knowledge, is actually a center-right neoliberal figure in the mold of a Habermas.

and parenti’s work is much more insightful anyway.

fuck chomsky.

everyone who was tearing their hair out about Gabriel Rockhill is going through the same humiliation ritual over this again

because chomsky was anti communist. he was an anarcho-lib.