• 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    tell that to the user whom I replied that.

    "I think the term “cheating” inherently means that the person not involved isn’t fine with it. "

    isn’t fine with it had zilth to do with consent.

    • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      "I think the term “cheating” inherently means that the person not involved isn’t fine with it. "

      Is precisely correct.

      Edit: in clarification. If your stated, mutually agreed upon, boundaries aren’t being broken then you aren’t being cheated on. If you’re ok with your partner fucking other people, but told them you aren’t for some reason, then I guess them fucking someone else would technically be cheating. But you should really learn how to accurately describe your boundaries with your partner.

      • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        yes, but that was a response to consent in sex, and not being ok with it, isn’t the same category as “third party not consented to sex” which implies rape".

          • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 minutes ago

            again. “not being fine it” ≠ “not consenting for sex not isn’t involved with”. when people have sex only the consent of persons involved in matters. still a shitty thing to do.