CityPop@lemmy.today to World News@quokk.au · 15 hours agoPakistan bombs Kabul in 'open war' on Afghanistan's Taliban governmentwww.channelnewsasia.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up158
arrow-up158external-linkPakistan bombs Kabul in 'open war' on Afghanistan's Taliban governmentwww.channelnewsasia.comCityPop@lemmy.today to World News@quokk.au · 15 hours agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareTheMightyCat@ani.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-213 hours ago Either by saying it’s the West’s fault that Pakistan is now bombing Afghanistan because they retreated and the Taliban took power. Yes but what im asking is why does the west get blamed for Pakistan bombing Afghanistan when: Pakistan bombs Afghanistan. They do this because the Pakistani Taliban attacks them. They can do this because the Taliban supports them The Taliban can support them because they are in power The Taliban is in power because the West lost the war. We are 5 steps away before we reach the West, yet the West is blamed. Saying the west “gave” back power to the Taliban is saying like Ukraine gave back Crimea to the Russians. If you truly want to say the west gave power to the Taliban we would need to go further back. Pakistan bombs Afghanistan. They do this because the Pakistani Taliban attacks them. They can do this because the Taliban supports them The Taliban can support them because they are in power The Taliban is in power because the West lost the war. The west invaded Afghanistan because of Osama Bin Laden Osama Bin Laden was in Afghanistan because the Taliban gave him safe refuge The Taliban could give him safe refuge because they were in power The Taliban were in power because the DRA collapsed. The DRA Collapsed because the Soviets Withdrew support. The Soviets withdrew support because the Mujahideen was too strong The Mujahideen was strong because the West supported them. That’s 12 steps away before the West causing this. outside of 5, were the West lost the war if you want to blame them for that. If any of these things acted different this wouldn’t have happend. Why is it only the West that is mentioned?
minus-squarebufalo1973@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 hours agoIf Afghanistan wasn’t a Taliban regime it would be a war of Pakistan and Afghanistan vs Taliban. No Kabul bombing.
minus-squareTheMightyCat@ani.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoAnd if Pakistan didn’t send planes then there would be no Kabul bombing. If the Pakistani Taliban didn’t attack Pakisfan there would be no Kabul Bombing. If the Taliban didn’t support the Pakistani Taliban there would be no Kabul bombing. The west fought the Taliban for 20 years, how long should they have fought on? 30? 50?
minus-squarebufalo1973@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoA good place to start is “if the CIA hadn’t financed the Taliban…”
Yes but what im asking is why does the west get blamed for Pakistan bombing Afghanistan when:
We are 5 steps away before we reach the West, yet the West is blamed.
Saying the west “gave” back power to the Taliban is saying like Ukraine gave back Crimea to the Russians.
If you truly want to say the west gave power to the Taliban we would need to go further back.
That’s 12 steps away before the West causing this. outside of 5, were the West lost the war if you want to blame them for that.
If any of these things acted different this wouldn’t have happend.
Why is it only the West that is mentioned?
If Afghanistan wasn’t a Taliban regime it would be a war of Pakistan and Afghanistan vs Taliban. No Kabul bombing.
And if Pakistan didn’t send planes then there would be no Kabul bombing.
If the Pakistani Taliban didn’t attack Pakisfan there would be no Kabul Bombing.
If the Taliban didn’t support the Pakistani Taliban there would be no Kabul bombing.
The west fought the Taliban for 20 years, how long should they have fought on? 30? 50?
A good place to start is “if the CIA hadn’t financed the Taliban…”