• DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    According to the article, it was a little obvious that it’d be Motorola. To me it’s unexpected as I wasn’t following this all that closely. In any case, I’m personally pleased with the OEM choice. I’ll need to do some research on Motorola’s smartphones to prepare for the one/s that support Graphene.

    • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      They are basically stock android with minimal bloatware for a decent price. I’ve been using them for years. There’s the whole Lenovo scandal but its hard to find any decent phone I want nowadays so concessions need to be made somewhere

      • dukatos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have Edge 50 pro and I can tell you it is full of shit. Meta services, their own shitty services installing crap of their choice, adware they are reenabling as soon as you disable it… You’ll need adb to remove all that.

      • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m mainly interested in the hardware, i.e., screen, camera, build quality, that kind of stuff. Though it’s good to know about the software, since Graphene will most likely be the same with its security features.

    • Hyacin (He/Him)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      To me it’s unexpected as I wasn’t following this all that closely.

      I was following closely - checking for updates weekly or more, while struggling to be so much as content with my P9FP and trying to decide whether to upgrade to a P10FP (marginal upgrades on paper, but they really help out in the weakest areas).

      Still entirely unexpected to me, and even in my wildest hypotheticals, Motorola was not on my radar.