• starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    My options are

    A) raise cattle which, as there are not enough grassy pastures, I will have to grow food to feed, causing harm to lots of smaller animals and insects

    B) eat the food I was already growing, and I will have to cause about 1/4th the harm

    C) grow my own food and use fencing and netting to prevent as much harm as I can

    D) starve to death

    If you can’t do C because you don’t have the space or time, then I wouldn’t blame someone for picking “reduce harm as much as I can without starving to death.” Paying money to people who are engaging in factory farming is not on that same level.

      • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        So the factory farms abuse animals, but since the grocery store is paying them with money I gave the grocery store, it’s okay now. How could I know that paying for the product of the factory farm would make them buy more from that factory farm?

          • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            True that is a huge leap to say that if people purchase something consistently the grocery store will restock it. They will probably just leave those shelves empty once their current stock is gone.