It’s less naive than an anti-kyc license. It’s very pro kyc, there is just a steep fee involved.
If said, absolutely no and the gov’t says kyc is mandated, that gov’t could have a judge strike out that clause. This license would not run afoul of such a law and judges are not going to strike out a fee simply because the effort and costs involved to obtain a waiver from package authors is inconvenient.
Don’t think in terms of prohibition. There is always a way to yes as long as the govt or company can go against the interests of it’s stakeholders and it’s helpful being open to financial suicide.
It’s less naive than an anti-kyc license. It’s very pro kyc, there is just a steep fee involved.
If said,
absolutely noand the gov’t sayskyc is mandated, that gov’t could have a judge strike out that clause. This license would not run afoul of such a law and judges are not going to strike out a fee simply because the effort and costs involved to obtain a waiver from package authors is inconvenient.Don’t think in terms of prohibition. There is always a way to yes as long as the govt or company can go against the interests of it’s stakeholders and it’s helpful being open to financial suicide.