In a blog post Richell notes that the New York version as far worse since it “explicitly forbids self-reporting and leaves the allowed methods to regulations written by the Attorney General” and so developers of operating systems and devices would have to have more than just your date of birth to put you into some age bracket like the California law seems to allow.

These types of laws seem to be popping up around the US. How long until this plague spreads to other countries?

  • Ftumch@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    These laws are stupid. If you want to protect kids, you should focus on getting parents the tools they need to lock down their kids’ devices however they see fit.

    • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That is kinda the point of the California one. The parents identify the device as belonging to a child when setting it up. There is no verification past asking for a date. The Illinois law also appears to be constructed in this way (I may have missed something though). The New York and Texas ones seem to require ID though the wording is vague. Utah and Louisiana outright require verification. Interestingly Louisiana’s law explicitly considers children married under 18 not to be minors for the purposes of the law.

    • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If you want to protect kids, you wouldn’t let a couple random adults dictate their life, body, education, and web access just because they happened to give birth to them

      • Ftumch@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        And it’s downright fiendish that a 100% imaginary thing like money decides who lives and who dies, but that’s the world we live in.

        It’s not that you’re wrong, it’s just that there are very few paths to a better solution. Perhaps the local people’s militia should take all children at birth and raise them? Until that time it’d be neat if parents had a simple, affordable way to stop their eight-year-old from seeing hardcore pornography.

      • Ptsf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It’s sad that people who don’t know what it’s like will probably disagree with you, and to be honest I do not have a entirely better solution as it feels like it requires positive intent not specific stipulations (Russia and North Korea for example take it to the other side of the extreme). The width and depth of the human experience remains one of it’s worst characteristics. 🫠