What makes it low quality? I’ve seen some shittier hand painted art.

I get the objection to it being AI generated, but I can’t place exactly what stood out as low quality…

Edit: the framing and creases in the print, not the image itself…

They absolutely can erase things on the internet, are you archiving this for when the other archives die? Are you gonna be able to share it when the time comes? And will anyone care?

That would happen if you store your passwords there too…

If you’re proactive enough with your passwords to manually store them in your own vault, you can be proactive enough to not use the corporate vaults that don’t allow exporting. This isn’t a “downside” of passkeys, it’s a downside of using the built in managers.

Say you don’t understand passkeys without saying you don’t understand them…

A passkey uses public key cryptography to secure your account instead of a password, it only grants you access to the one account you set it up for, and the account provider only holds your public key, you control the private key. Your passkey is a secure alternative to passwords because you CANNOT reuse it across services, cannot reasonably remember it, and the method of using it isn’t by copying and pasting into a field like a password, so it isn’t susceptible to the same attacks.

If the provider loses your public key, they can’t give you a challenge to verify you have the private key, so you lose access. Just like if they lose your password hash. It’s an identical scenario.

Your password hashes (assuming they even hash them) already live on their servers…

Ethereum formally introduced the concept of smart contracts, and they had serious potential for modernizing financial contracts and push back an entire predatory industry of leechers, but instead it was used to create meme-coins and scam coins and ruined it all.

It’s move to proof of stake instead of proof of work dramatically reduced its energy usage, and makes it a actually scalable, but the masses lost interest when they couldn’t just make money off a few GPUs and turned to the aforementioned shit-coins built on the Ethereum network.

Ethereum is not bad, it’s one of the better ones. It’s just kind of responsible for the explosion of shit/scam coins, because people are shitty scammers.

That’s freedom surveillance! Flock AI cameras at every corner tracking your every move and feeding directly to racist corrupt militarized cops is A-Okay, because China is the real evil.

Enumerate the ways the Chinese government is worse than the US government. Take the plank out of your eye before complaining about the spec in theirs.

Have you seen most YouTube videos? Nothing can hold up to the garbage content being pumped in by scammers and low effort “influencers” and shit like Mr beast or the Pauls or whatever is popular these days. We don’t need YouTube level capacity for good content.

The “royal we” refers to royalty referring to themselves individually in the plural form.

I have not once had a good experience with gnome since the gnome shell was introduced. And I exclusively used gnome before for years.

I’m enjoying Cosmic desktop.

If it has a screen, theyll put ads on it. If it doesn’t have a screen, they’ll add a screen, then put ads on it.

There’s a future coming where every fridge sold will come with a screen for ads, and not necessarily any other smart features.

Once people accept this shit, there’s no going back.

The license behind it is not mention anywhere.

Are you lost? The overall discussion is people freaking out about FUTO’s license, that’s why this thread was made, that’s why people are upset with FUTO, that’s why they are accusing FUTO of being a capitalist corporation that wants to ruin open source, and that’s why they’re talking about backdoors being introduced to immich because it’s now under FUTO.

I’m not combative, you have a bone to pick with FUTO and are making up excuses to complain.

I simply agreed with you and explained why people are freaking out about FUTO: lack of understanding and mob mentality because of an article that says they’re bad.

I don’t have a bone to pick with FUTO, I’m simply saying people are freaking out about FUTO’s license and making up weird scenarios for what can happen to the software if it’s under FUTO because of lack of understanding. I highlighted what I think is good and bad about FUTO’s license because I seemed relevant to the discussion in the thread.

I’m agreeing with you. Immich’s source is available and REGARDLESS OF ITS LICENSE, whether it’s Open Source or Source First, you can literally see that it has no backdoors and compile it yourself.

You are being combative, and in a very weird way.

last I checked you have to request the source)

So you haven’t checked… Good to know you don’t know what you’re making a strong statement about.

Then suddenly someone is knocking demanding money.

No, they don’t come knocking, because you wouldn’t be using the code in your commercial product in the first place, regardless of how small it is.

Donations are not the same thing as paid licenses, and FUTO’s license is bad because it prevents you from funding your fork. But funding doesn’t mean exploitation for profit, which is what corporations like Google do with copyleft code.

Its about the community as much about the code.

Right, community != business.

I want my code to be freely used by all in the community, and I explicitly do not want a corporation to exploit my work for their profit. That’s antithetical to the concept of community.

I’m a fan of the PolyForm Noncommercial License 1.0.0. In an ideal world, the GPL would be sufficient, but we don’t live in an ideal world, we live in an exploitative capitalist run world and they will do everything they can to profit off the labor of and destroy the community that develops open source software.

Fund the development of the code you spin with donations and foundations and whatever you want, but don’t charge for and make profit off others’ labor.

This whole thread is about the FUTO license… And the fear about immich is stemming from not understanding it.

Your comment, that I replied to, was specifically about the immich’s license…

You’re being a bit ridiculous, and weirdly combative since I was not disagreeing with you at all.

I said nothing about immich, the commenter you replied to seems to think because immich is under futo it’ll somehow start collecting your data. If immich was using the futo license, literally nothing will change about how we use it… People are freaking out and inventing ridiculous scenarios and they don’t understand what they’re objecting to (FUTO’s license).

It’s coming from technical ignorance. There’s little wrong with FUTOs license, here are the limitations:

First the good:

You may use or modify the software only for non-commercial purposes such as personal use for research, experiment, and testing for the benefit of public knowledge, personal study, private entertainment, hobby projects, amateur pursuits, or religious observance, all without any anticipated commercial application. You may distribute the software or provide it to others only if you do so free of charge for non-commercial purposes.

Yes, good, I don’t want Google using my code to make billions.

And the not so good:

Notwithstanding the above, you may not remove or obscure any functionality in the software related to payment to the Licensor in any copy you distribute to others. You may not alter, remove, or obscure any licensing, copyright, or other notices of the Licensor in the software. Any use of the Licensor’s trademarks is subject to applicable law.

Bad. If I forked and majorly modified the code by significant contribution, I don’t see why my release should have a “donate” link to the original producer and not for my efforts the donor is actually using. This is the same problem the first limitation seeks to address, but from a different angle; namely: monetizing “intellectual property” instead of work.

Copyleft is cool because it means freedom, but everyone in here fighting because code first prevents them from potentially monetizing the projects they like is completely missing the point of copyleft.

If you ask them to articulate their concern, I haven’t heard one that isn’t on the lines of “I want to be able to use this code in my paid product”…

FUTO could technically scrap the current version, grab the last MIT version of the code, relicense it under their “source-first” license (or any other license they like, pretty much), and declare “this is now the official development version of Immich from which new releases will come.”

If they pulled that off, a community spinoff from that same version would become the new immich killer. Not the first time it’s happened, and the current maintainers aren’t the only ones capable of maintaining it.

Everyone acting like they’ve never heard of “Free as in Freedom not as in Free Beer”

They give you the source. They let you modify it and use it, just don’t make billions off someone else’s freely available work.

How that translates to “most of their stuff is proprietary” and the one smartass that thinks it’s a good argument to say “ffmpeg doesn’t mind their code being used in YouTube, why should you?”

Until we collapse capitalism the billionaires will take our hard work and make billions off of it until they force kill our projects and replace them with proprietary closed source shit. A license that prohibits corporations from making profit off our work is A-OK.