If there’s public information about the methods they use to protect their privacy, then those methods aren’t working.
If there’s public information about the methods they use to protect their privacy, then those methods aren’t working.
If there’s a new party willing to take over administration of the entire instance as-is, why not just transfer ownership of the original server?
I assume it’s because it reduces the possibility of other processes outside of the linked containers accessing the files (so security and stability).
The password to my home server is a salted hash of my primary (memorized) password, so I can recover it from any computer that can run the hash function. From there I can access the rest of my saved passwords, bookmarks, etc.
CasaOS is not an operating system and more like a GUI for Docker
So it’s more like Portainer?
The current version of Affinity is great and will continue to work forever—there’s no need to switch to an alternative if you’re already using it. I just don’t have much hope for its future development.
I guess technically, Raspbian.
The Affinity Suite is great, but I’m suspicious of its acquisition by Canva—I’m afraid their solution to “bringing the suite to Linux” will be turning it into a web service.
Ok—to the extent that SVG is HTML, the variant of HTML that it is is a flavor of XML.
More precisely, both are flavors of XML.
Internal server (Home Assistant etc.): domus
External server (Nextcloud etc.): nimbus
Router/firewall: murus
If they tell law enforcement they can’t produce an unencrypted copy and it’s later proven that they could, the potential penalty would likely be more severe than anything they could have gained by using the data themselves. And any employee (or third party they tried to sell the data to) could rat them out—so they’d have to keep the information within a circle too small to make use of it at scale. And even if it never leaked, hackers would eventually find and exploit the backdoor, exposing its existence. And in either case they’d also have to face lawsuits from shareholders (rightly) complaining that they were never warned of the legal risk.
I believe so—see Wake-on-LAN.
While [Trump-supporting] CEO Andy Yen’s recent public statements have raised my hackles more than a little, Proton remains structurally committed to privacy, encryption, and user control, ensuring its ecosystem stays independent of political shifts.
That’s a pretty weak definition of “Trump-proof”.
If anyone’s interested in adding similar functionality to their own MediaWiki installation, you can use the ModernTimeline and SemanticMW extensions without the need for an AI to parse the pages for dates.
The issue I see is ensuring that a distributed archive is comprehensive. How do you know what’s missing and needs to be added unless there’s a central coordinating process aware of what everyone already has?
deleted by creator
Anyone using DeepSeek as a service the same way proprietary LLMs like ChatGPT are used is missing the point. The game-changer isn’t that a Chinese company like DeepSeek can compete with OpenAI and its ilk—it’s that, thanks to DeepSeek, any organization with a few million dollars to train and host their own model can now compete with OpenAI.
How does that compare to the growth in size of the overall code base?