

I thought wikipedia mods are overly zealous with checking submissions by new users.
Seemingly not so. Kinda worrisome
Usually a lurker.
Maybe I should’ve just shut up and thought for a bit longer before writing that comment…
If you want to talk to me elsewhere, you know how to reach me.


I thought wikipedia mods are overly zealous with checking submissions by new users.
Seemingly not so. Kinda worrisome


My mother is also a prime example of piracy hypocrisy.
Piracy bad
and about 1 week later after having complained about the electricity bill my server incurs:
Can you get me this show?


Flac pls


our mp3*
Both bad.
Edit:
For the downvoters:
:^)


I have clipboard history enabled but holy is that an actual security nightmare.
IMO not a good requirement to have.


seedbox.io (now hostingby design) is (i believe) based out of emirates and they host/rent in leasenet.nl datacenters.
Running one of their grandfathered plans.
And they allow(ed?) public trackers. Havent received a letter :)


They also usually stay true to their car brand.
So the choice has been narrowed down to their house brand and the current/last year model.
So much choices… /s


What is an “actual clipboard”??


It’s all three of them.


What I’ve read is it’s about: Preservation.
This aint just about piracy because free media.


Not as dramatic but similar sentiment in german (tech) news.


In theory yes.
Hardware tokens are bound to keys
Software baes tokens can be synced with password managers (3rd or 1st party)
And the client cert abandonment problem is an entirely other issue.


Windows recently introduced support for Passkeys.
But it can only be used with Bitwarden, if you have Windows Hello enabled ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
And I don’t want to use anything else than a regular password.


To me they seem
A More user friendly
B Abstract away the burden of keeping the mTLS synchronized across devices
C Can be used in hardware and software.
Feel free to correct me if my assumptions are wrong.
That is the real question!
To the last sentence: Never said so. But yes, it’s a start.
For the first part:
That’s why you need and have to be aware of a target group.
I’d assume Wikipedia implemented a whitelist rule for trusted edits and new accounts edits are hold in limbo until they are confirmes entries, no?
If Wikipedia actually allows for live edits to the page without any further checks, it seems very naive or very stupid to me.