Last time I looked at this community it was to discuss things about reddit (e.g. admin/mods decisions etc.)

Fuck off with ads or say right in the title it’s an ad.
Hope you coordinated the post with the mods.

Blamed?
More like responsible. Alongside big tech

Forgot the exact context of the comment I initially replied to but it was meant as a pun with the goat (animal)

The issue with being unable to websearch public (indexible) knowledge on products, services or problems wont be due to forums dying out or devs switching to discord servers (or adjacent) but instead putting the docs behind an AI gatekeeper and preventing you from just downloading the straight PDF or reading the kb article as an outsider.

You will own nothing, know nothing and be nothing and you will be happy.

What a surprise…

Don’t you have phones?

Now we need to change that to

A: Don’t you have NVMe SSD(s)?
B: Don’t you have SSDs?

At least he wasnt goated…
They can be mean…

We have RAM supply shortage.
Now better? god…

Whose? (/s)

So AV1 is not free?

What a bad take.
Are you really asking Mozilla to restart supporting Windows XP as well because the web browser is used for some embedded application, too?

And so what?
If the user liked Firefox, they will need to switch the OS anyway. Doesnt matter if Apple, MS or Linux. Firefox is present in all them.

Great.
Now your data is (potentially) exactly where you are trying to keep it out of.

So you made it more cumbersome to yourself by keeping your data as local as possible, yet still chosing to give up the tiny sliver of additional security for the comfort of others.

I don’t want to be annoying. But I hope you see what I am trying to convey.

Bitwarden did so too.

But IMO your assumption is a bit of interpreting bad/malicious faith into it.
I see it more like they are the more publicly known brands/services that do this and underwent the audit.
I have read the TLDR by the authors (linked a few times in the comments) and the answer by bitwarden.
Bitwarden said the, fixed the issue, are in the progress of doing it or are accepting it as “this is intended/a trade-off”.
What is a bit sad is that they had more vulnerabilities than other vendors. But I trust them more as they are mostly OSS.

What I am wondering myself: Do the different amount of attacks mean the attack surface was greater or had more vulnerabilities or what made them only do 6 on Dashlane vs 12 on Bitwarden?

Edit:
In another article it was total identified vulnerabilities.

Great.
I am now your spouse and you want to give me access to the flash drive. What now?

New requirement: I have several passwords I want to give you access to as well. What now?

As with everything: Your solution may work for yourself and a few others. The majority don’t want to collect 5 flash drives in different locations every 3 months to update a file (and making sure it’s the correct vault they have copied)

Or you can change the encryption to argon2 in the settings with salted hashes.
Granted it’s probably not per item but at least something.

“We want our work to help bring about change in this industry,” says Paterson. “The providers of password managers should not make false promises to their customers about security but instead communicate more clearly and precisely what security guarantees their solutions actually offer.”

Great.
Now which password vault was the most cooperative and clear in their security communication and which one wasnt?
The author said that they have given the providers time to fix the issues. Now highlight the ones that did it the best… >_>

Pretty easy.

Pray they don’t break in the next 4 years.
I’ll join you