• 0 Posts
  • 5 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 6th, 2026

help-circle
  • Aqivex@fedinsfw.apptoComic Strips@lemmy.worldDitto
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Wait…

    They (TR) definitely were involved in the “creation” of Ditto. In the pursuit of Mew. Who already “was” every Pokemon, in a sense. But you don’t start that sort of research from scratch.

    You pick a likely candidate for trials that has whatever traits you’re looking for.

    How does a Team Rocket experiment get a lower number?

    If they did something to #132 that led to not just a lab specimen Ditto…but altered all instances of #132 in the wild also.

    Dear Arceus…they genocided #132 and rewrote the children’s history books. The monsters.

    /hj



  • Aqivex@fedinsfw.apptoComic Strips@lemmy.worldDitto
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The way I thought it all shaked down (and what I thought was established fan canon long ago), was that the Cinnerbar Mansion experiments were an attempt to clone Mew.

    Ditto was one of the first failures (and I bet the poor guys have it worse than no thoughts of their own, but rather their very thoughts are constantly trapped fighting shifting self-identity, if we want to go Grim Dark lol)

    And they never got to perfect a Mew, because the next stage in the experiment precluded that.

    That they achieved Mewtwo, after Ditto, and the scope of the project rapidly changed when the “benefactor” (sue me, there’s still kids picking up the games, I ain’t spoiling it, but we know who we’re talking about) bankrolling the project got the initial “power level readings”.

    So they pumped Mewtwo, their perfect IV monstrosity, with both forced and artificial EVs, until what happened, happened, and Mewtwo had to go hang out in that cave to get some peace.

    Meanwhile the Dittos suffer ;(


  • You entirely sidestepped the scenario and issue. In the example given, the copyrighted work is being produced directly onto a medium that obfuscates its provenance, literally. Yet, gives an opening for another to publish it in such a way, that they could claim it’s their copyrighted work. They would be lying, and they would be wrong, but then you would have to prove to a body composed of ancient mummies who uphold an ancient code, why one of the few ways they thought they understood technology and codified into their verification process, isn’t actually showing them the truth this time. Do you know how to defend a copyright claim?