https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RANKED-CHOICE/zdpxqrolgvx/
I like that this explanation has pictures
https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RANKED-CHOICE/zdpxqrolgvx/
I like that this explanation has pictures


The super-racist NPC is the only one I went straight to skipping dialogue over. He was a useless wall of ham


Toy story 5 might add enough characters to subsist on for a while


Is 🙋 this 💁 not 🙋 shitty 💁 enough 🙋
In case anyone from the future comes by
https://web.archive.org/web/20260502061148/https://infowars.com/
That’s manchego. You’re thinking of the female parental figure that is so fat, the sun revolves around her


Instructions unclear, steering wheel now layered in zip ties


Stumbleupon was the best.
Took me to a site once, where a person would write out what they’re dealing with, and a random other person would send them an existing song. I assume it was all anonymous.
Like this one person posted about dealing with a horrible aunt, and I sent back Jonathan Coulton’s “Someone is Crazy”
All I see is a bunch of fuzz. Try reuploading?


This was my first impression, too. Like they’re used to typing orders at an LLM, but not used to the conversational style of a forum
Tbh, I thought it was another of the cheesecake guy’s posts. I saw this one before the ice cream thumbnail, lmao


That’s INSANITY.
Sometimes future me has the memory of a goldfish, and I fear that, for future me, the online sources that guided me before won’t be there for me anymore
I second Obsidianmd.
Even before adding community plugins, the search, organization, and the ability to easily link to other documents/screenshots make documentation so easy for me


Some might be upvoting this in cheeky irony, but I see this as a modest proposal.
This position deserves a longer form article & widespread publication, and numerous calculations & studies detailing how much more ethically beneficial this would be for society. Would it not be more efficient to curb idiocy among the masses by regulating people’s choices in population control than conducting intimate mass government surveillance? Would it not be a higher ethical stance to give people the illusion of choice by making them work for the privilege of birthing, maintenance, and management of another human being?
Counterpoint: it is cheaper and cost-effective to dehumanize and control the masses with the technical advances we have today , and-also, to hell with ethics. Think about it. If car manufacturers would be made responsible for designing cars to identify bad actors, we wouldn’t have to deal with the inevitable consequences of people who gain their driving licenses but bend the rules anyway. We could do with discarding licensing altogether because it’s not perfect. Only by singling out and reprimanding each person for their faults with the conviction of a Walmart micromanager and the ruthless efficiency of Palantir surveillance - can we create a more perfect bubble of safety for society.
~(I don’t have time to even pretend to cough up statistics, k thx bye)~
Seconding this. I use Puppetstring (by ar14?) for face, audio, & midi key tracking with my inochi2d model though
It’s on itch .io and steam