It’s not that it’s slower than ext4 but that btrfs itself has gotten slower.

He didn’t need the job, they needed him.

Trying to turn it into one will attract lawsuits

Photoshop wasn’t the inventor of their GUI. There were many paint programs that predate Photoshop that Photoshop based their GUI on.

And there hasn’t been a “look and feel” lawsuit since Apple sued Microsoft.

It’s not dev time to fix UI complaints that have been made for 20 years. They have added hundreds of complex features in that time.

It was their ethos to not be Photoshop no matter how convoluted their alternative workflow needed to be.

Only on some and name brand PC’s which used it for compatibility. For home built or local store, the turbo would overclock. I remember telling a friend, that although their 16mhz could run at 20, to not do it because it would compromise longevity! Ha! Mind you the cpu’s in those days didn’t have heat sinks but still- Oh no your 386 might not work in 20 years from running too hot!

It was a scifi energy source and materials emit light when hot. You don’t need oxygen.

They invented a really neat diode. It creates electricity when it emits ir. But of course that isn’t enough to get research funding which is why they make ridiculous hype.

Original is assymetric (perfection in the meme). Maybe you mean the first remake?

I think Lucas did it to create controversy to generate sales.

Especially maclunkey.

Is the anime worth watching? If so, which? Was the 2017 a remake or following later manga?

Sorta bullshit from the same lab that hyped their night time solar that works but is thermodynamically impossible to be practical.

Flash an ir diode with encrypted data and because encrypted data looks like noise, you can’t tell that the data isn’t just heat noise.

That’s it.

They invented a bunch of hype words to get press because unfortunately that’s how labs get money these days.

Also wrong.

Only 21% of Americans directly own stock.

https://www.fool.com/research/how-many-americans-own-stock/?msockid=3cc1caf3010a68e612d9dc83002769e8

You can’t say a statement is wrong by agreeing with it. You just said that they use clearing houses. The majority of stock ownership in the US is through mutual funds and other similar products where individuals cannot vote.

You can vote if you buy stocks themselves and not mutual funds.

I said people who buy mutual funds can’t vote you muppet.

SEO is one reason that’s less common.

No it isn’t. SEO is about gaming the search engines to place their data ahead of everything whether relevant or not.

Yahoo was fantastic in it’s time because it was human curated. No SEO could bullshit a person reading the page and categorizing it.

Google was fantastic at the start because SEO couldn’t game the system. Google was famous in the early days for maintaining quality by keeping their algorithms secret and constantly changing so that SEO couldn’t break their search.

I’m speaking as someone who was first on the Internet in the 80’s.

A mutual fund buys and sells on behalf of the consumer so individuals don’t have voting rights.

but we’re literally talking about a potential currency alternative so the process/method is extremely relevant.

You are holding up an imaginary system (crypto with all the safety of a credit card) against the existing credit card. We weren’t discussing potential ways crypto could be fixed. As crypto exists today it is not immune to fraud as you claimed.

Jedi have some precog so Obi could have answered:

“My boy, you kill him. You’ll cut off his hand after he asks you to join with him to defeat the evil Empire. This weakens him enough for the Emperor to electrocute him.”

yes it’s actually important to understand how money moves

I claimed credit cards protect consumers. You countered with "For example we know things like card skimmers " Once I explained that consumers are still protected you tried to make it about the process of a credit card company recovering their money which has fuck all to do with consumer protection. You invented a personal definition for fraud not because you don’t speak English but because your claim that crypto protects against fraud was bad.

You are not arguing in good faith.

I wish it was that way. Soo many ads are completely irrelevant. The only platform where I get good ads is google news (the swipe left on Pixel). It’s filled with Adafruit ads. I’m cool with that.

I’m not questioning the end user impact lmao

Their internal mechanisms and work with police work is irrelevant to me as a consumer. It is therefore irrelevant for you to bring it up.

You are arguing that a new car warranty doesn’t exist because a dealership has to pay a mechanic to fix the defective car they sold. You are ridiculous.

I’m from Texas, I am a licensed financial professional

Then you god damn know the actual definition of fraud not your silly redefinition.

Gtfo.