• 0 Posts
  • 1.31K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle
  • Oh right, it’s logarithmic, so that wiggle area is much bigger than it would be on a similar linear graph. I also forgot about the sun swallowing the earth, which would prevent Greenland from getting into another order of magnitude, though there is always the possibility that earth will get flung either to a higher orbit or out of the solar system entirely before the sun swallows it and Greenland will last for trillions of years.





  • The only one that I think stands a chance is the xbox one, and that’s assuming they combine it with gamepass. Because that was the only thing that sounded even somewhat appealing to me about the idea of remote gaming: being able to try a bunch of different games legally without needing to buy them all. Like netflix but for games (and not just mobile games like the actual netflix games).

    Having my own devices that can handle playing games, I have zero interest in paying full price for a game I own even less than most games these days (because at least with the files all being stored and run locally, it opens up other possibilities, like hacking it to still run without DRM if its DRM server goes out or modding it). That was deal breaker #1.

    Dealbreaker #2 is of course the latency. I use an ETX via VPN for my work and just typing on that thing is annoying because of the latency.

    The subscription cost is another big negative, though I guess I wouldn’t call it a dealbreaker. Though I currently have 0 video game related subscriptions (I don’t count netflix, assuming they haven’t given up on their games).

    On the pros side, the only things I can think of is that it limits cheating (though separate devices would still work) and it gives you an option to play if you don’t have a device capable of playing it, though you do still need a device, a display and sound system, and a good internet connection.


  • I believe it is an attempt to use an argument that they will care about. You could write a brilliant piece about how that many bots hurt culture and society but if the ones you want to convince don’t gaf about either of those, they probably won’t even read what you have to say, let alone change anything because of it.

    Or, more likely, they won’t even see anything here, at which point that comment becomes more of a “they aren’t even very good at what they want to be good at”.

    Like from my pov, the top of the corporate world doesn’t just not care about those things but is actively trying to destroy them because they think they’ll do better in a world where none of those things are as they currently are.


  • It is subvertive, just against the 420/69 culture. It’s an anti-joke that only works because 69 was already a huge meme. You’re too close to the source material to appreciate that their joke number is at least as good as ours. Plus bonus points because it serves the function of trolling older people in retaliation for all the vague “you’ll understand when you’re older” they probably got each time they asked about why older people thought 420 or 69 was funny.

    The kids are alright. I don’t expect them to solve this shit any better than we did, but I expect that there will be some pretty good memes as humanity barrels closer to extinction, collapse, or serfdom (or some combination of those).


  • But the brilliant part is that they aren’t selling this shit to kids, they are selling it to parents and there’s an extra dynamic of parent trying to make kid happy and kid probably picking up on that and acting happy to please the parent, resulting in the parent buying it more times when neither of them really care about it.

    It’s insidious and reminds me of those car commercials where they are marketing “a new car will make your teenagers want to spend time with the family instead of their friends” instead of trying to sell the car itself.



  • Electric elements are actually pretty efficient. Usually the heat generated by an electric current is the inefficiency (as well as sound, radiation, and vibrations), but for a heating element you’re using that heat waste. It still can generate sound, radiation, and vibrations, so it’s not 100% efficient, but you can do well just sticking an element in the middle of the thing you want to heat, especially if it’s a fluid. If you don’t stick it in the middle, then you lose heat in all the directions away from the thing you’re trying to heat.

    Heat pipes are more efficient because the heat isn’t being generated but just moved. Natural gas (or fossil fuels) seems more efficient but is actually just cheaper, as it used energy that was stored a long time ago.

    Even induction burners still lose heat from the bottom of the pot into the induction burner itself, hence why they usually have cooling fans. And the reason why they are more efficient than radiative heat or those spiral elements is because they create the heat closer to the food using an electric current in the bottom of the pot/pan itself, though even the induction part has additional losses.


  • My guess is you’re getting contamination from something else. All a microwave does is emits microwave radiation inside the faraday cage that is made from the microwave’s frame/cover, and as the microwaves pass through, they flip di-polar molecules (molecules that have one side slightly more positively charged and the other slightly more negatively charged), which creates friction and heat. Water is one such molecule.

    One reason some people don’t like to use it to cook have to do with how it affects the texture. Microwaves heat food up from anywhere the waves spin water, whereas most other cooking methods involve heating it from the outside, so water is evapourating more there, plus you can get some oxidization to add a brittle crunchy layer.

    It can also damage other molecules and affect their structural integrity in ways different from other forms of cooking.

    It can occasionally do this thing where it heats the water past the point of boiling but without boiling the water (superheating). Not sure if that affects cooking as much, as it usually requires pretty pure water and is more a safety concern because that water will explode when it realizes that it should actually have changed into a gas already (which usually happens because you bumped it while picking up the container it’s in).

    And that container is the last part. You don’t usually cook with plastic containers because they melt in the high heat used for cooking, but they seem fine in a microwave. But who knows what’s happening at a micro level. A metallic taste is probably something other than plastic, but my guess is that it’s coming from whatever container you were using, especially if you’re microwaving something in a metal container of some sort. That would form current eddies that can arc, but if the surface is smooth enough it won’t necessarily spark visibly, but could be breaking particles off into your water that you then taste.


  • Lifespan is in seconds, not years. Greenland is old.

    For all complex life and most of simple life, Greenland was there. It was in different places and depths, but those rocks were there for most of the time. There’s only a few other places on the planet that rival Greenland’s age (or more specifically, certain rock formations in Greenland, though they make up a significant portion of it).

    Though one thing about “lifespan” is that it’s intended to be “age at death”, not “current age”, so I’d call that an inaccuracy, as Greenland will probably continue to exist for billions more years (though when the glacial lakes eventually form and break free, there will be a lot of sudden erosion).

    Makes me curious what the future lifespan will be for the various continents. I wish our own lifespans were more geologically significant. Though at least I got to see the time since dinosaurs tick from 65 million years ago to 66 million years ago.






  • Oh, how long until an AI ends up swatting people. There will probably even be different categories:

    1. Legit swat scenario, wrong address (or otherwise incorrect details make it turn tragic)
    2. Caller deliberately trying to swat innocent victim, AI goes along with it and adds credibility (not that humans seem to take away much credibility, so maybe this one shouldn’t really be a black mark for AIs if it does happen)
    3. AI just misinterprets a caller’s description, deploys swat team
    4. AI doesn’t trust the caller’s description, deploys swat team (anyone ever seen an agent start suspecting they were in an adversarial situation where something was injecting things into the context? I have)
    5. AI uses dispatching tool incorrectly, accidentally deploys swat team

  • Though once you have been driving your manual for a while, you can get a feel for the speed from the engine sound and knowing what gear it’s in. Or even from the throttle level equilibrium is at and how much of an incline you’re driving on at that equilibrium. And probably also from just getting used to how fast things come at you at various speeds.

    Not that I’d give up the speedo but checking it is more of a confirmation thing than a real lookup.



  • There’s a sad set of shows from before I got tired of laugh tracks. Sad because they are harder to enjoy now that I understand the laugh track is pretty much just there to dumb down the humour.

    Though that could be an interesting remake formula: take some existing show then redo it but without a laugh track or live audience. I hated how live audience shows needed a pause after each main character’s first appearance while the people present did the whole “scream because you see a new celebrity”.