SSL VPN is the more general term to describe it, and there are definitely some vendors that do that. Not sure about standalone VPN software though.

A VPN wrapped in HTTPS would be basically undetectable. Yes, your ISP could start marking IP addresses as “VPN”, but that would be a wack-a-mole situation, and wouldnt scale at all.

Yes, but out of context. They refactored their policies to make them legally correct, this was an intermediate step. There is another comment with the current policies linked in it.

It’s meant to be low effort and a bit shitty, any amount of polish is missing the point

Look for the additional storage section under the app settings:

This is worth $20

Show us the JPEGs, I want to feel second hand financial instability

Easy solution, buy one, find yours, cancel order.

Someone needs to create a placebo-amazon.

I’m guessing they can rip the other end of the lock out of the wall tbh.

But realistically, theifs aren’t that sophisticated, they aren’t going to waste time trying to find and destroy the DVR, the will grab whatever valuables they can carry and pawn and leave as fast as possible.

The cameras are really just a deterant, they will move on to an easier house instead of risking it with mine.

Home security first of all, with cameras to deter thiefs. That alone mostly solves the problem, but I’m in a relatively safe area.

My “lab” is just a switch, nuc and unifi cloud key, and while they are warm in their closet, its not super hot.

I have a Kensington lock on the security camera box, but someone could theoretically yank that out of the wall.

The rest really isnt worth breaking in to steal.

When I used to have SSH on a nonstandard port, I got login failures from bots. It really depends on the bot and how aggressive they have set it up.

I dunno where you are getting your discussion from, but those points have come up very frequently.

iPhones have locked bootloaders, and that likely will never change.

So would not Faraday caging my house, guess which is cheaper :D

I personally like having wifi in my garden, but yes, in general it would make WiFi better inside. And painting internal walls would be silly.

Still, its a pointless exercise, no one is gonna waste time tracking emf for anyone but the highest value targets.

That shit is unimaginably classified

Check warthunder forums :D

EMF paint definitely exists, its been used on military planes for decades now. But the emf paint from Aliexpress? Definitely sus.

EMF observation may be technically capable of all of those things, but realistically, anyone who would go to that extreme (of targetting a single households occupants) is equally capable/likely to just barge in, arrest you and slap an ankle monitor and security cameras in your house. So its kinda pointless to worry about it.

This is well into literal tin foil hattery, but:

You’d have to check what kind of frequency range it actually protects against, and you’d need a way to test it (no doubt there is some fake emf paint around as well).

You could also wrap your walls in chicken wire and get a pretty decent Faraday cage effect for cheapish.

It’ll also break your wifi and phone (if it works).

Unless you are running a spy agency, this is just a waste of effort IMO.

11-12 should be well tested. 12-13 should be well tested. 11-13 may work, but you may be the tester.

I’d step through one at a time.

Bummer. You could get a cheap IoT light bulb/smart plug and ping it in a script, when it times out, start the shutdown. Could be a fun project.