Interesting concept, but I have to assume it’s gonna get corrupted by LLM bros eventually.

I have a website, but I honestly wouldn’t know who else to trust, so that is also a problem.

Damn, you don’t get sunshine? That’s crazy poor…

You mean rich country, they got a whole extra stripe!

Die for oil probably…

Buy an aliexpress endoscope camera.

Restore is future me’s problem. Fuck that guy :D

Do your backups work?

that 21.5% of all goods imported into Australia were from regions with known forced labour issues

Unless “forced labour issues” means 100% of the products produced in the region are made by slaves, the 20% number is an upper limit.

I think it’s mostly a defence against getting sued if they got caught. Chrome can point at their policy and get the case dismissed, Firefox would have to defend it in court and risk losing.

But you are absolutely correct, privacy policy’s are only as binding as your ability to enforce them, and you and I don’t really have any means to enforce them against a large Corp.

That’s a bit more than docs for a mouse, that’s technical documentation for a chip…

I’m triggered.

Writing a privacy policy for an entirely off-line app was endlessly frustrating.

And it’s crazy that there is no validation of the policy, you can say what you want and then do anything you like…

You’d have to ask Braves lawyers. It could just be that Mozilla is more risk averse, perhaps brave thinks they won’t be sued.

It would be nice if they were clearer, but I think they don’t want to (or legally cant) define exactly what they do.

The reasoning for Firefox changing their policy is that legally, in some jurisdictions, a sale of data is very ambiguous.

They are sending a “count of active users” to advertisers, which their legal team thinks counts as a sale of private data.

Is this good enough a reason? Up to you really. Their policy is fairly wide open for further actual data sales now, it certainly gives me an itchy feeling.

It’s just not worth the effort. You’ll find out they have change their policies on something, and you’ll have to fix your app to suit. It’s an endless churn of busywork

One time fee sure, and then they close your account for not pushing updates frequently enough…

What are the odds that PRS doesn’t represent the rights on the music they claim to?

Sure, but the critical part is that it should be on a classified network.

Whenever these statements are made about “not using signal/whatsapp/matrix for classified data”, they are referring to the public systems, not an internal self hosted system.

Classified information shouldn’t be outside of a classified network. Signal and Matrix do not qualify for that.

Surely that should be case opened?

I’ve seen lots of people describe LLMs as a junior developer, but for this very reason, they are worse than a junior. I can train a junior and build them into senior, so the time spent correcting mistakes is still worthwhile. I can’t train an LLM, so correcting mistakes is just pointless.