While human developers bring intuitive understanding

Well… some do.

Jokes aside, I don’t think this is an undiscussed topic, and ultimately, the solution is the same as it as always been: project culture. Project leaders need to insist that code is responsibly written and reviewed, and to make it part of the team culture. AI doesn’t change that.

We can leave NZ out, a few Uruk-hai really don’t contribute much to a modern military, and they don’t have anything else to contribute really.

On the period front: https://bloodyhealth.gitlab.io/ Open source, funded by the EU, and private.

I also wrote one for my partner, but it’s gone because google sucks and killed my dev account.

Different bits of data have different levels of privacy. My comments here, public, I have explicitly shouted them out to the world. My home address, private to friends and family. My pornhub history, private to me exclusively.

It is a perfect honeypot. Do local compression for the majority, but if the IP comes from a government IP block, serve a different page and upload…

https://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/04/alot-is-better-than-you-at-everything.html?m=1

They also want the safety net of the maintainers. It’s cowardice really.

They can fork Godot and let their LLMs go at it. They don’t have to use the Godot human maintainers as free slop filters.

But of course, if they did that, their LLMs would have to stand on their own merits.

Those kind of challenges only work for a short while. Chatgpt has solved the strawberry one already.

That said, I wish these AI people would just create their own projects and contribute to them. Create a LLM fork of the engine, and go nuts. If your AI is actually good, you’ll end up with a better engine and become the dominant fork.

Why does that need to be cloud storage at all? Off-line storage is the securest option, so you need a very good reason to want to put it online.

16 GB USBs are a few dollars each, buy a bunch, store duplicates across the USBs. Make sure you plug them in an use them once a month, and that will easily last you all year. And if you need to give it to your healthcare professional, just give them the USB.

Good luck on your weightloss!

You’ll also weed out the BDSM crowd, are you sure you want that loss of talent?

Take a break - maybe, I can see the benefit for small business owners.

Die? Fuck no, I’d be ashamed to even pitch that as an idea.

Just because they are a distasteful company, doesn’t give us free reign to spread lies about them. There is plenty of verifiable true things to say.

The signal protocol and encryption explicitly prevents the transit server decrypting messages. That a theoretical hidden third person (who may or may not be part of meta) in the chat doesn’t change that is e2e encrypted.

Simplifying it down to "they might have a hidden back-door, therefore it’s https is a dishonest framing in my opinion.

Them including themselves as a participant still does not make it “like https”.

Being sued also doesn’t mean anything, anyone can be sued at any time, and there does not need to be a basis in reality for it to go ahead. It is not proof of anything.

They control the app, they can obviously steal the messages if they wanted to, but you are making very strong claims with zero evidence.

I don’t like meta any more than you do, but if you are going to make claims of “like https”, bring actual evidence.

Whatsapp still predates signal, they just migrated the network across. And your own link confirms that.

Also, whatsapp, by your own link is e2e encrypted using the signal protocol. That does not make it “like https”. Whatsapp could snoop your messages off your device, but they cannot read them as they pass over their server.

https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=39717

https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=37977

Doesn’t look promising. Maybe dualboot.

And then they sink millions into chasing crypto, AI, etc…

I googled for the default port of dynmap, AI gave me the minecraft default port. I knew it was wrong, but that would have been annoying if I didn’t know that.

Seems it has been fixed now, but definitely kills the trust.

Crazy that Mozilla themselves didn’t put this out.

You can AI as hard as you like, you’ll probably not manage to replace the really complex tools.

I have just started writing a laser cutter tool, and I tried some suggestions from AI for doing basic matrix transform calculations, and it was completely wrong. So I wouldn’t trust it for anything moderately complex. That said, it was fantastic for the UI.