

Yup, and it was a shameless money grab.


Yup, and it was a shameless money grab.


They guys who keep getting their domain cert expire over and over… and over… and over?


it’d be fairly annoying to connect to Tailscale, and really annoying to connect to Wireguard or Yggdrasil.
Tailscale is a managed Wireguard service.


I gotta know. Do you know what a use case is? I’ll give you a hint; it’s not the same as a use.
Lol, what? Was that even English? I mean, I know those were English words, but you tried so hard to make a bad counterpoint work that you kinda broke the language there a bit.


The use case is simple. AI coding assistance. There’s a reason why Anthropic focuses almost entirely on code. Full on vibe coding is bad, but as an assistant it’s great.
maybe you should present a pitch to them if you’re so confident
They already know. The problem is they’ve sunk so much money into it already, that they’re literally hoping there will be some breakthrough that justifies all the money.


It has its uses. The way it’s being pushed is a different issue entirely.


Oh don’t worry. Chinese citizens already can’t drink their water.


If every data centre was passively cooled in the ocean it wouldn’t change temps by even 0.01 degrees. The Sun blasts an entire half of the planet with an absurd amount of energy every day. Energy, which technically originated from the sun, is just converted and being utilized to do work.


The issue with climate change was never with “heat production”. It’s always been the generation of heat trapping chemicals. The sun sends a stupid amount of energy our way. Generally the earth radiates almost the same amount back out into space, with a minor amount captured by various things, like photosynthesis.
Pollution alters that equation and causes more energy from the sun to get trapped in the atmosphere. That’s the problem. We could never generate as much energy as the sun (even the tiny amount that hits the earth), but we can definitely alter the atmosphere to trap more and more of that heat.
Also, the ocean is a MASSIVE heat sink. I saw someone work out the calculations recently, I don’t remember the numbers, but the conclusion was that we’d never measure a notable increase in ocean temps if we housed every datacentre in existence in the ocean. The sun hitting the ocean every day dumps more energy into the ocean directly than we’d ever be able to manage.
It all comes down to pollution.


Team building is fine, even beneficial, when done right. Which is almost never.
This picture is from a Jehovah’s Witness publication. This isn’t a depiction of heaven, but rather a future paradise earth. And the picture depicts various people being redirected back to life.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_police_overseas_service_stations
“Chinese police overseas service stations garnered public attention after human rights group Safeguard Defenders published a report accusing the Chinese government of illegally using the stations to intimidate Chinese dissidents and criminal suspects abroad and to pressure them to return to China.”


So what, you like 1000 years old?


And replacing it with “fart” sounds even more silly. You’re not proving anything with this.
And I actually think Canonical’s approach makes sense. They’re not directly benefiting from the AI tools. They’re just making it more accessible for users.


No shit?
None.
Guess what - we already take up a lot of land. Put some solar panels up there ffs.
Can I send you the bill?
And geothermal’s a thing just fyi.
Same question.
Damn you’re full of useful information.
Most people think so.
Instructable? Cool.
Autocorrect on mobile is a thing. Nice deflection from the main argument that you can’t refute. I had meant to write “indestructible”, and it’s true. CanDu has several safety features and design features that make a meltdown functionally impossible.
We actually agree on that
I call bull on that, nearly every single comment from you is about how “nuclear isn’t safe”.
your nuclear blathering takes too long.
Words are hard, huh?


YOU don’t understand these are just the ones we know about.
You know what, I actually agree.
So the deaths attributed to solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal are just the ones we know about.
Edit:
If you had bothered to read the post you’re supposedly responding to instead of talking shit on automatic you might have addressed that.
I did, I actually clicked through the majority of the links you posted (the ones I didn’t I’m already familiar with).
The point I made was that you were just trying to gishgallop and fact spray without understanding the nuance of what you were presenting.
Don’t be mad when you get called out.


Good luck after graduation.
I’d bet good money that I’m older than you.


Nice list, but what you’ve demonstrated is that you in fact don’t understand.
You’ve listed out just about every nuclear incident in history. And I mean every nuclear incident, not just nuclear power related. A number of the ones you’ve listed were medical accidents (patients receiving excessive doses, and one incident where a medical device being dismantled was done improperly), or accidental exposure from orphaned sources.
The reality is that there have been no deaths from nuclear power generation in this millennium.
Excluding Chernobyl, 90% of all radiation-exposure deaths from nuclear generation happened before 1962. If we include Chernobyl, then that jumps to 1986 (the year of Chernobyl).
After Chernobyl, there were 5 deaths from radiation exposure, and none after 2000.
Modern nuclear is extremely safe.
The reason all of those incidents have their own Wikipedia pages is because incidents/accidents in a global scale are very rare, and when they do happen it’s a full-blown investigation with extensive reports. Even for a minor alert of elevated radiation readings by the nuclear facility.
If you had bothered to read the links you posted, instead of copying and pasting from Wikipedia (or wherever you copied from) you would have understood that.
It’s not the functionality I’d be worried about.