It does matter. I signed up to lemm.ee originally. The 4th biggest instance It is no more and my account and a few communities went with it. That risk still exists on mastodon.

Ip address, I’d assume.

Probably fingerprint.

So this is basically a rebrand of fiverrr or whatever it’s called?

It ain’t a sport though. Competitor is more accurate. They don’t call chess players athletes.

I used to have crackling issues with pulseaudio. It needed restarting constantly. Not issue since the switch to pipewire. So my experienced was the absolute opposite of yours.

I have GOS on Pixel 6a. Good, but battery now starting to show it’s age. But this was at 3 years, rather than the 1.5 years I’m used to.

Definitely would recommend.

Also, it’s just well thought out tech. Can play it like a controller. Touch screen is good. Customisable controls and the track pad for mouse based games is chefs kiss.

Its nice to own. Nice to play.

Nice. Back down to 2.17% next month.

Steams survey doesn’t seem to be very consistent.

You must work in dreadful places. I’ve seen it a few times, but most places have been productive.

It needs a good lead dev to set the culture though.

Whitespace change debates can be avoided by using rule sets in IDEs and agreeing standards within the team.

Good static code analysis tools in pipelines and IDEs handle most technical issues leaving reviewers to focus on design, maintainability, clarity and readability.

You can avoid pickiness if you communicate why, so they learn and understand. If you use PRs as a training and learning tool they’re quite productive. If not sure, ask why something was done.

And if you get picky comments respond with “personal preference and not part of team rules”. But also, you cannot be defensive in your PRS. You have to be open to feedback and points and happy to discuss. Be polite even when feedback is invalid. Defendivesness kills constructive feedback and no matter how old you are and how long you’ve been doing it, you can still improve. Oh and if you been doing it that long, you’re a senior or lead and can influence how things are done.

Is GTFS short for Get The Fucking Schedule?

I want it to be true.

A distinct lack of integrity. I’ve avoided jobs for companies who I know build nasty stuff. I don’t want that on my conscience. If I’m semi-competent at my job, I’d be enabling the acceleration of that.

Surprised he got as far as he did. Every line of code that touches production should be reviewed.

If it’s shit, fail it until it ain’t. To allow that shows a distinct lack of technical leadership.

You’ve since shown far more and that should build trust. Never trust contractors without verification.

Actually if you cannot be replaced, you’re less likely to be promoted. How could they move you from your crucial work. You also show leadership by upskilling and building a team that is stronger and independent. If you can do that in a small team, you can do that at a larger scale.

If a company operates different, they’re broken.

Don’t let insecurity push you to sacrifice your integrity, you’ll hate yourself more.

Fair enough. Appreciate the info.

An insulin pump doesn’t work without an app?

Sheesh, that’s dystopian? What if a diabetic doesn’t have a smart phone? Surely there is an alternative? How did they function before Android?

Unfortunately…

Like?

Heroic doesn’t work in all cases. I have to have both installed to use my library.

I’ve had many issues with other software and ended up having to use Lutris.

Lutris may have bad code, but functionally mature is generally what succeeds. Sexy code that doesn’t work exists on a handful of computers only.

There is a reason we are talking about it. Its the most popular Linux launcher. Wishing that wasn’t true doesn’t change the fact it is.

I watched. He used a prompt with exact wording from an example and obviously it’s the most logical continuation, so AI would generated it. We know how they’re trained. But how many open source prompts will start with exact code and comment? Unlikely to ever happen in real world. So unlikely to he direct infringement. Someone could easily sue the AI companies with these examples to prove it infringes copywrite work, but then govs are going to protect them so it won’t happen.

It’s unlikely to get identical output without intention, but it’ll also take the infringed actively taking steps to sue that case. Stastical likelihood of this happening in real world is low.

I’m with you in wanting to watch the AI industry collapse. But I’m unfortunately in a minority without the lobbying power, so it won’t happen.

But there was attribution, so you can easily check out commit before attribution was removed, use git blame on class attribution to see when it started, and fork before it.

They can. They just need to find the first instance of AI, branch from the commit before and start with that as a basis for master. Then push that branch to their own remote.

If someone cannot do that, they probably aren’t competent enough to maintain a project of this importance. They can then cherry pick commits that are good and merge those. Or request others recreate new PRS with them with correct attribution. It’s tedious, but easy.

Maintainership isn’t fun. The hardest problem is finding someone that cares enough to take it on. Many would give advice if someone was willing.

Sounds like Lutris dev was burnt out, so it would probably quickly replace it.