DaGeek247 of https://dageek247.com

  • 19 Posts
  • 280 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 16th, 2024

help-circle


  • By default, it does not; the predatory nature of this particular company notwithstanding.

    For an extreme example, all I have to do to give a smoker a craving for a cigarette is too mention how bad it smells. It doesn’t matter that I did it in a negative context, just that I mentioned it.

    For this company, a gambling company, which is known as addicting enough to ruin people, just sharing the company name is enough to cause similar affects.

    For regular companies the affect is also there, just in varying degrees of strong. As a lesser example, I could give you cravings by just mentioning a specific soft drink, so long as I guess the right brand.









  • It really depends on your who your workers are, but I absolutely don’t use emojies in work emails. I do use them in teams messages though.

    Emails are for conversations I want documented. Chat messages are the equivalent of a desk conversation.

    Also, yeah, angry emojies are still taboo at any type of work chat for me. Can’t be seen as angry at the office.






  • They (the Jedi council) discovered that Dooku was evil after/during the time they were forced to use the clones to rescue anakin and co. So like, yeah, the group of people involved in the clone creation was sus, but at the same time they were already neck deep in a war when it all came out and they had a moment to think about things.

    A better Jedi council wouldn’t have accepted the positions of generals over a slave army.

    A better Jedi council would’ve stopped at using slave soldiers to rescue a pair of Jedi and a politician.

    A better Jedi council would have been suspicious of a slave army being made in their name.

    A better Jedi council would have treated anakin as a person first, instead of as child soldier / prophesied savior.

    The better Jedi council didn’t exist. It was an indolent, slow, and prideful Jedi council, and that’s why they failed. That was the whole point; to stuck up in their own assess to see what’s going on right in front of them.

    I think it makes for a great story, if not the one that we might’ve hoped for.






  • You brought up butts.

    No I didn’t. You did. It’s right above my comment. Don’t lie. Everybody can see you mentioning butts first.

    My point with going to an extreme with that is even you can agree there is a line somewhere where something shifts over the line of “too ridiculous to consider for serious purposes”.

    And my point is that “too ridiculous to consider for serious purposes” being the current state of things is wrong and needs to change to allow for less serious things to exist.

    There is a conflict here. There are at least three options to resolve it. Either the company needs to change, anubis needs to change, or the users complaining about the other two groups need to change.

    I’m arguing that the company is wrong for not changing. I’m also arguing that the user is wrong for complaining about anubis’ branding. Hell, I’m even arguing that anubis is right for choosing to skip out on mainstream branding.

    My point with going to an extreme with that is even you can agree there is a line somewhere where something shifts over the line of “too ridiculous to consider for serious purposes”.

    In short, I’m saying that anubis is nowhere near crossing that line.