• 2 Posts
  • 47 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle
  • Thanks, yeah I will consider the options. Would be nice to have it in one as the raspberry pi is aging (it’s an original model B) and the gateway should be plenty powerful enough to run it, plus it would rule out the pi-hole to router connection as a possible reason for the unstable network.



  • Well I was hoping to spend the same amount and get one that does everything I wanted 😆. I’m happy with separating things if it make sense, but I have two power points and already have too many devices in that spot (fiber connection modem + ISP router + two raspberry pi’s (one for pi-hole, one for home assistant) + a switch + RF sensor for detecting doorbell + more I’m probably forgetting). Some of these are powered from USB ports on other ones. Being able to replace the ISP router with a gateway that’s also a switch that also handles the pi-hole would mean three of those devices become one, and it seems feasible!



  • Dave@lemmy.nzOPtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldPihole on gateway device?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Thanks for all the info and the detailed response!

    But it sounds like you only need it to be a wired router, which is good.

    Correct, don’t need wifi.

    PoE ports as a requirement is what narrows your options considerably I think

    I’m happy with doing this through a separate switch, but I’m happier if I can have less things to plug in. It’s not a must have though.

    Mikrotik has a lot of routers with PoE out. Their newest model in the RB5009 series can do either passive or 802.3af/at PoE out. Many of their older routers have passive PoE only. Make sure you know what your cameras need.

    I don’t have cameras yet, but I’m considering some Reolink ones. Happy to take suggestions. Am I likely to find a lot of difference in the PoE type or are most things compatible with each other?



  • Dave@lemmy.nzOPtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldPihole on gateway device?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    One of the things I use pi-hole for is to set customer DNS entries so anyone on the network will be redirected directly to the self hosted services when the type in the appropriate domain name. So it’s not just about the filtering (which I also want), but also the (network wide) custom DNS entries.

    I’m also happy with simple. I’m not overly against keeping the pi-hole and gateway separate but was just wanting to know if combining them would be an option (which is sounds like it is, but not super easy).


  • Dave@lemmy.nzOPtoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldPihole on gateway device?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    It’s a little bit more complicated than I made out. For one, the network is super unstable and restarting the ISP router seems to fix it. I want to replace the router to test the theory that it’s the problem.

    Secondly, this is a bring your own router to the ISP situation, but the router came from another ISP, but they are all the same ISP in the end because one company owns a whole bunch of ISPs and sends the same router to all the customers of all the child companies. Long story short, it’s the router they would have issued to me, but they didn’t, because a different subsidiary sent it to me before I changed ISPs to take advantage of a special because I live in a country where the lines are open and anyone can start an ISP using the existing lines but if you get big enough to be competition then the big company will buy you out and pretend it’s still a separate company. But if it doesn’t work well then it’s up to me to solve unless I am willing to pay the ~$10USD for them to send me the ISP router that is supported by them but it will be the same cheap router as I already have. Ok that’s not a very short story but that’s why it was easier to just call it an ISP router 😆








  • I believe blocking an instance hides posts from your feeds but nothing else, but it’s worth testing.

    I have lemmit.online (reddit copy) blocked, but I can still search for a specific post and view it. I have also seen others complaining that when they bad an instance they still see comments from users on that instance, so at least at the moment it seems it just hides the posts from your feeds.


  • Ah right! OK first off, you can block all of Lemmy.world with one action now.

    Secondly, Lemmy now supports image proxying (with a new feature in Pictrs 0.5, which I believe was also introduced in Lemmy 0.19). I’m not sure which instances have it enabled but in theory you can check the source of images for remote users who have posted images.

    Lemmy is already a strain on hard drive storage so I don’t think many people have enabled it (proxying will store the images on the Lemmy server for a set period of time).

    Thanks for the explanation by the way, it makes sense.


  • Both Lemmy and Mbin lack the ability to filter out or block Cloudflare nodes. They both only give a way to block specific forums.

    Lemmy lets you block whole instances, it was introduced in 0.19.0 (which was released just before Christmas, but many instances didn’t update until 0.19.3 was released around the start of the year due to federation issues with 0.19.0).

    I don’t get why you want users to be able to apply cloudflare filters, though. If your instance doesn’t use cloudflare, then you won’t access through cloudflare. I’d actually be really interested in understanding why this is something you’re looking for, rather than just the ability to block an instance such as Lemmy.world.