As far as I’m aware, it started out with a Vim color scheme, which looks like this:

https://github.com/morhetz/gruvbox

And yeah, that’s just become a really popular theme, which got ported to virtually anything that can be themed.
Personally, I really like the color palette, but not that so many takes on it have text that’s horrendously difficult to read…

https://infosec.exchange/@0xabad1dea/116335209525412306

And 3 months later, i have not booted it once

Oh man, I know the feeling. It took me 5 months to remember that I had a Windows partition.

It was so important to me, to have a way back (which is fair enough), and then I just completely forgot about it.

The problem is that in this case, the LLM just naively auto-completes a password from what it knows a password to most likely look like.

It is possible to enable an LLM to call external tools and to provide it with instructions, so that it’s likely to auto-complete the tool call instead. Then you could have it call a tool to generate a correct horse battery staple, or a completely random password by e.g. calling the pwgen command on Linux.

But yeah, that just isn’t what this article is about. It’s specifically about cases where an LLM is used without tool calls and therefore naively auto-completes the most likely password-like string.

I imagine, it’s a matter of asking it to generate some configuration and one of the fields in that configuration is for a password, so the LLM just auto-completes what a password is most likely to look like.

There’s a very faint “pbfcomics.com” in the bottom right in the last panel.

It’s Apple’s programming language, kind of intended as a successor to Objective-C.

From what I hear, it’s actually decently designed and has quite a few similarities to Rust. Still not sure, how great it is outside of the Apple ecosystem…

My instance went down, so I’m way too late to make this joke, but anyways:

We’re not cantankerous, just a little …crabby. 🙃

I hear, it helps with saving up for treatment by not paying for nudes. 🥴

Definitely possible. I remember being genuinely appalled when our teacher casually told us that most stories can be divided into three acts (Setup, Confrontation, Resolution).

Rationally, I’ve understood that it’s almost like a law of nature. You kind of have to tell stories this way.
But on an irrational level, I’m thinking, great, they’ve spoiled the end of most stories. If they all end with a resolution, why even bother listening to them?

…that is somewhat of a hyperbole, but there are further subdivisions that make this even more obvious. Like hero’s journey that you named, where you can tell that they’re going to survive at least until the final conflict, and even then there’s a pretty good chance for a happy end, because people like those. If my brain latches onto one person being the hero, it feels like I know the remaining story arc already.

And I have to admit that I don’t read much, so this is the first time I’m hearing of Le Guin.
But it’s not just the writing either way. I do also always feel like I might as well read about the real world before I read about fictional worlds. I don’t need to know about aliens and dragons, when ants exist and are so much cooler.

Hmm, that is an interesting point, because I do also prefer roguelike videogames to RPGs. They compress the whole character development down into a much shorter timeframe.
And while it’s still a factor that it’s just your stats growing vs. your enemies’ stats growing, you do have a pretty clear goal to reach.

You also most definitely have no plot armor either, as a single death is the end of that story. And the randomization of the levels certainly adds to that, too, as I can’t get the feeling that I should be able to manage anything the game throws at me.

My favorite roguelike !dcss@lemmy.ml has these historic quotes on items and spells. And the Swiftness spell has verbatim this text as its quote:

…which is the best gameplay advice for that game, for any situation. 🫠

Yeah, I might block a contributor on sight, if they post something like that.

In case, you’re not aware, you can also email the dev. You can code up your commits as normal and then use e.g. git format-patch -3 to put the last 3 commits patch files. You can then attach those files to an e-mail and the dev can apply those patches with git am.

It takes a bit of playing around, but it’s actually really easy.
The Linux kernel, one of the most complex projects on the planet, develops like this.

I think, you could open the same file multiple times and then just skip ahead by some number of bytes before you start reading.

But yeah, no idea if this would actually be efficient. The bottleneck is likely still the hard drive and trying to fit multiple sections of the file into RAM might end up being worse than reading linearly…

Yeah, and the worst part is that submitting the PR is trivial. You just offload the reviewing work onto the maintainer and then feed the review comments back into the AI. Effectively, you’re making the maintainer talk to the AI, by going through you as a middleman, a.k.a. completely wasting their time.

I am literally just describing how I feel. It’s not a take. You don’t have to like it.

Yeah, there are still indie titles with infamous creators. It’s just that the limelight is now taken by big corporations with big marketing budget.

Eh, I was kind of punting towards all of fiction there. With something like Scrubs (if we count that towards fiction), it doesn’t bother me, because the situations are realistic and then as many others said, it’s about the stories that unfold in that scenario.

But even copaganda or trash TV will play up each new case, e.g.: “Jeremias has not touched grass in 17 years. Will our team succeed in changing that?” and “The police has been on the hunt for this serial killer for 5 years. After 378 victims, will Shirley Holmes finally catch him?”.

I guess, yeah, it is also a matter of bad writers, though. It is far too easy to come to a point where you need drama and to then just make up big numbers with no credibility.

It was certainly one of the examples on my mind when writing that, yeah. 😅

I think, it was One Piece where I first noticed this, because I actually tried to watch that regularly on TV as a kid, but Dragonball perfected it with the whole “Power level over 9000” meme…

Yeah, not to yuck anyone’s yum, but this has been one of the reasons why I always thought fiction in general, but in particular superhero stories, anime etc., wasn’t that interesting.

Like, wow, you thought of some arbitrary description for how the villain is by far the strongest. Except for that other villain in the next episode, of course, who’s even strongester. Oh, and did I mention that our hero is a total weenie, but somehow also stronger than these guys? Crazy, isn’t it?

I know, you’re supposed to indulge these stories and not question them too much, but pattern-recognizing brain says no. 🫠