

Well, I disagree but I get where you are coming from.


Well, I disagree but I get where you are coming from.


So, looking at that argument, you would give the same advice for a human?


it certainly hasn’t improved much since then.
I’ve heard the opposite talked about quite a bit.


I choose to believe you meant to call autocorrect defiant :)
*nasty chipses
Yeah, thats my understanding too. I just think the point would be better made with comparable numbers than with comparing apples to oranges.
for comparable numbers we have to control for amount of humans in proximity to sharks vs amount of humans in proximity to humans.
I mean, id still wager humans win out, but not nearly by as much.


what movie is this?
Hahah, that’s the one I was thinking of, though I couldn’t remember the origin, thanks!
or take 0.6+0.6=1.2 and round it to 1+1=1


Star Wars IS the past. It’s literally the first line in each movie.
Oh come on, I meant you are a kid in the context of the memes scenario, not in real life. Not a single assumption was made.
nothing, but you’re a kid and don’t know that.


so in other words its a catch-all for legless animals?


now do it with fish!
Getting people in EV’s would be great! if only there were some initiative from governments to help people afford that, that would be good for everyone.


question, why is a declaration not a statement?
Actively ignoring the DM’s campaign direction is a dick move itself.
rexes are something else!
When I was little we had two devon rexes, both were the most bumblig idiot cats i’ve ever met <3