devs? yeah, no.

no?

It’s technically infinite, but the set of numbers we can express (in a reasonable timeframe), while large, is finite.

if you get hit by a wall with infinite weight, moving at 1km/h, it has infinite energy, yet it will merely push you away

You have it backwards. Larger vehicles of course have more energy, but pedestrians are too light for that to make a difference.

If you get hit by an oil tanker ship going ~1 kmh, that ship has orders of magnitude more kinetic energy than a car at highway speed, yet, unless theres a wall or something, the ship will merely push you harmlessly aside.

Its about the manner of delivery, not the vehicles energy.

Larger cars are more dangerous because they hit you higher up, where you have more vital organs.

I agree, large cars are generally much more lethal to pedestrians, due to their shape, not kinetic energy.

Thats not how kinetic energy works, no pedestrian is heavy enough to stop any car, small or large.

eh, you know what, fair enough!

way to shift blame

wtf

oh wow I didn’t know that!

would make sense to give more a lot incentives for EV buying if so!

deleted by creator

It is also chromium based, so stands to get the same nerf.

What would be better though?
I have my problems with mozilla, but between apple, google and mozilla, they absolutely win in my book.

While I’m completely disinterested in football, and I do think the craze is often more than a bit much, this is just overly reductionist. Does everything one cares about and finds fun/interesting necessarily need to have intrinsic value? I’d say no.

deleted by creator

a real life example? you mean like a photo of a person next to a router?

depends a lot, but yes some lights are like that.

OK.

Let’s not pretend it is in any way the same thing it was a few hundred years ago.

Royals used to be the ruling class, the top dogs, the owners. this is obviously not the case any more.