I seem to remember a book where TVs watching people was a core element of the setting. Ah well
I seem to remember a book where TVs watching people was a core element of the setting. Ah well
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imperate
I don’t think they used it right (and they’re a Spanish speaker, see the little tag?) but the verb they used is a valid English verb.
Your heart is in the right place, but relying on what Wikipedia calls a fallacy and on implicit “natural rights” both undermine your argument severely. Your fourth paragraph is far and away the most valuable one.
OP asked how to explain socialism, not how to do anticommunist apologia for social democracy.
christo-jihad
“What are we, a bunch of Muslims?”
In a country with many vocal boot lickers (“play stupid games . . .”) it seems like a fair term to have in your lexicon
This point specifically I think is unfair. When you liberate a prison that has prisoners from far away, you can’t necessarily arrange for everyone to get sent home immediately. Honestly, with the state of anatomical atrophy the survivors had been reduced to – such that eating a larger-than-average meal would kill them – I’d worry about them even being able to make the trip if it was taken immediately.
I could be missing something though (and I concede that them still being there in Sept. 1946 means they were probably being unduly deprioritized)