I mainly carry thumbdrives for larger files or things I don’t want hosted online.

That’s what I would go with if I was inclined. Create a volume the size of the drive and add a hidden volume with a different password within like we’ve been doing for years (decades at this point maybe almost).

DrunkenSlug is another great indexer, invite only and about $30 USD per year for their top offering.

Wow, that is amazing to hear. While I don’t want to be pulled over, in the southern US I’ve never been pulled over doing 10% over the posted limit. My wife on the other hand, calls me a slow old man as she goes whatever she thinks feels right.

I was thinking a box of cereal, but I like the cut of your jib!

If I ever end up back in a Walmart and see these, I’m definitely setting something in front of them.

I try a lot of stuff that’s a lot younger than Jellyfin but I respect your position on it. From what I’ve read the most serious identified issue will allow unauthorized playback, but one requirement for the exploit is knowing the local system path for the media. It forked from emby somewhere around 8 or so years back and I managed to trust emby back then so maybe I’m being a bit overly naive.

My main issue with Plex is that it only supports using its auth servers so when their having an outage, so am I; I’d rather control the media server and it’s IdP.

Or feed those steams into Dispatcharr and back to Jellyfin/Plex so you can pause/skip/record what’s on.

People keep saying that Jellyfin is scary to expose to the internet but Plex isn’t. Could you share your reason for it?

Same here, I’ve had a lifetime pass for a bit over a decade but now I just keep it for coworkers and some family members. Jellyfin just runs better 99% of the time.

Which problems? The only one I know of requires the attacker to know the exact media path on the local server, even if they figure that out all they gain is the ability to view that file.

Seriously though, if there is a bigger vulnerability out there, I’d love to know about it (the only one I found would allow unauthorized viewing).

That’s the only reason I opened the comments… To be fair though, I think I’m gonna adopt that term.

Technically he didn’t enter the PIN. When repeatedly asked for it with no way to speak to a lawyer first, he gave them his PIN. Did they ask for his phone PIN, yep, did he give them his phone PIN, yes. Had they asked for a specific PIN for the device, they might have been able to get one specific to a profile on the device but they didn’t.

Did they ask him if this PIN was for a specific profile? Doubtful so it’s kind of on them.

That’s the fun part… There wasn’t one, he just happened to oppose a very unpopular thing happening in his city.

As one of those kids, he’ll probably turn out okay. As a juror, it’s better to let a piece of shit go free than make an innocent person rot in jail.

When the kid grows up I would almost guarantee that he would make the same decision.

It may be an IT person thing but I like numbers lol.

While I am not entirely disagreeing, I have to a bit for anyone that can’t bring themselves to say it (all sides should be heard).

I may have misread but I don’t think he typed the PIN, as far as I understood they had already taken the phone and were insisting he give them the PIN without any access to a lawyer. Not only did he not wipe it, he only gave them the ‘I’m in duress’ PIN because he felt he was, if I’m on the jury it’s innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Definitely have to check this out, thanks man!

The man was in duress and being forced to hand over his PIN while being denied access to legal counsel, that is the very reason for a duress PIN. I don’t think the charge is even going to make it to real court, his defense has a great case for it to be thrown out.

It’s much better now, I put off moving from cmd until somewhere around 2015 when I was using ‘invoke-command’ constantly, over the last decade or so I’ve moved to powershell proper cmdlets… Its actually not that bad.