Gotcha. As an aside, the syntax to refer to a user is @username@instance
, for example mine is @JackbyDev@programming.dev.
Professional developer and amateur gardener located near Atlanta, GA in the USA.
Gotcha. As an aside, the syntax to refer to a user is @username@instance
, for example mine is @JackbyDev@programming.dev.
Source? Sounds like an interesting read.
Why do you care if it has wifi if it’s not connected to a network?
Wahhhhh this tool can’t do two things well, it should only be doing one thing well! 😭😭😭
Or as I’ve started to call it, GNU minus Linix
I feel like this incident is over blown. The weird holding back for 2 weeks without testing is a valid complaint though.
Oh, I thought it was because zsh is better.
The company that laid me off let me keep my Mac which was a nice parting gift. I don’t think I’d ever buy one myself. They’re just way to expensive.
If openSUSE Slowroll wasn’t experimental I’d recommend it in place of Manjaro. It’s a rolling release with monthly releases.
I’m not doing that unless it has its own compiler.
I disagree with a few points of that article.
Another misunderstanding of “open source” is the idea that it means “not using the GNU GPL.” This tends to accompany another misunderstanding that “free software” means “GPL-covered software.” These are both mistaken, since the GNU GPL qualifies as an open source license and most of the open source licenses qualify as free software licenses. There are many free software licenses aside from the GNU GPL.
You do too by using the term FOSS instead of FLOSS,
The terms “FLOSS” and “FOSS” are used to be neutral between free software and open source. If neutrality is your goal, “FLOSS” is the better of the two, since it really is neutral. But if you want to stand up for freedom, using a neutral term isn’t the way. Standing up for freedom entails showing people your support for freedom.
The FSF and OSI agree on many of the licenses they approve as being free/open. If you can tell me of any notable differences that aren’t a matter of one of them not commenting on a particular license yet then I’d be open to change my opinion on it.
Regardless, even if you believe the OSD and FSF’s definition of libre software differ, merely having the source available is not enough to meet what the OSD defines as open source. Which is what this conversation was originally about.
I’m just using Gmail lol. I don’t really do anything with email.
I never got around to using WSL for dev stuff, sadly. I was stuck on Windows 7 until December 2019 and have had a Mac for work ever since. For personal stuff I just use the MSYS environment included in Git for windows (it has bash and a few other things). If I ever got a Windows laptop for work again I’d probably put the time in to learn WSL.
These are three super different things that fill entirely different uses. It’s like asking if you should use a car, a boat, or an airplane. If you just wanna mess around then probably VirtualBox unless you only want terminal stuff to mess around, then you’d want WSL.
They lost so much trust when they did that, truly an insane, shortsighted decision.
Open source is synonymous with “free software” as in freedom. Source available is likely what you’re talking about.
I’m not sure if the source is available or not. I remember some talk about it a few years back, but I don’t know what happened. Either way, just because source code is available does not mean it is open source. When I say open source I mean libre.
That’s how swatting works though. They don’t just call 911 and say “send police to this place” lol.