• 2 Posts
  • 80 Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月9日

help-circle
  • Small local companies are smaller versions of the same thing, and yes, they are protected by their LLCs. I’m in the small business world and I am constantly shocked by the level of incompetence and short-sightedness of the average business owner. There is no way the average person gets a business loan only on their proven track record of effectiveness in executive roles maintaining consistent profitability. I once went to a seminar for small business people and the speaker literally revealed that the secret to a successful business was to make a profit, and profit equals revenue minus expenses. There were business owners in the room who literally did not know that or had any idea at all of their financials.

    What businesspeople at all levels know is that you never ever risk your own money. You risk other peoples’ money. Risk the money of people and institutions who wouldn’t miss it or who would miss it that you can gain the confidence of. When you hear about “chronic entrepreneurs” who owned a series of failed businesses until they finally ran one that was successful, it’s not because they proved they were competent to get a loan in the first place. They proved they were incompetent several times, in fact. Having limited liability applies in this context. Having good connections applies most of all in these contexts. Most people becoming business owners aren’t seasoned experts who have proven to our wisened financial leaders that they are responsible enough to manage a business.

    I have no doubt that there are some honest workers who believe capitalists when they say their money is at risk and willingly risk their own money on a business venture. This is absolutely not the norm.


  • Software defies economics. It can be replicated almost infinitely at almost no cost. When software companies sold software one package at a time in the 90s anti-piracy was a big deal because it was very simple for any given person to “copy a floppy” and receive the full package of software from another individual without the company knowing or being involved. It was like borrowing a rake from a neighbor, but the neighbor got to keep his rake as well.

    Because of this, software companies decided instead to treat software as a service rather than as a product. In the 2010s many software companies shifted to the subscription model where instead of selling software one package at a time, the service of the software would be available to rent while the company guarded the propriety aspects of their software. This was like the company owning the rake and both you and your neighbor needed to pay the company to borrow the rake.

    Now software can be reverse-engineered without the source-code. Now if you rent the rake from the company, you can keep a copy of it and freely distribute it without the company being involved or aware. I’m not sure how software companies will reckon with this advancement.





  • Kwakigra@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml•shhhh 🤫
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 个月前

    Ending capitalism would be the easy part. It would be cutting off a hydra head from the body of hierarchy. The forces to recreate the system would be stronger than the forces to invent a new one in a time of chaos. Daydreaming about violence is childish and probably the result of watching too much military propaganda as a kid. People have to want to change before they change, making them change suddenly makes most people reactionary.






  • Kwakigra@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml•title
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 个月前

    I’m aware that this information wouldn’t be so interesting to the present apparatus of Western hegemony if it wasn’t to their advantage to spread it. There are plenty of atrocities the US supports directly which tend not to get as much news coverage. I chose Wikipedia because it’s a general amalgam of hundreds of different compromised sources rather than link any individual news source or government office. I have yet to see any evidence that contradicts what these highly biased sources say, only that I should believe a different biased source offering no evidence at all because the US is more evil (It is more evil, I agree).


  • Kwakigra@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml•title
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 个月前

    The original claim was the meme, I said that internment camps are not at the same level as extermination camps or a campaign of elimination (the full text of what I said is on the mod-log, don’t want to break the rule I broke again by saying more), people asked me to prove that there were internment camps and I offered the well-known Xianjiang camps as an example. Since that exchange the primary argument I’ve had is that I fell for western propaganda, which I admit is possible. So far evidence to the contrary of the existence of the camps in Xianjiang have been claims by Chinese government officials I found myself which contradict one another. No hard evidence disproving any of the mountain of evidence (which could be compromised, I admit) has been offered. I am biased that I tend not to believe massive institutions which are advantaged by presenting specific narratives generally, which is why I don’t just believe what the english-language sources say nor do I believe what the Chinese authorities say without supporting evidence. I find that if there is a mountain of evidence that these camps exist, and if none of the evidence has been contradicted or disproven thus far, then it’s more likely that these camps exist than don’t exist.



  • Kwakigra@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml•title
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 个月前

    I agree that there is frustratingly little evidence provided by the Chinese government when the Western claims could be disproven and discredited. All I can find are counter-claims which contradict one another.


  • Kwakigra@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml•title
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 个月前

    It is not possible to prove something absolutely. It is possible to disprove things. This is also how science works. There is a ton of evidence supporting the existence of these camps, but others have made fair claims that this evidence is all suspect. I would like to see official evidence to the contrary of these claims, rather than counter-claims which contradict one another on the existence of these camps.



  • Kwakigra@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.ml•title
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 个月前

    I don’t like entertaining the stupidity that is the white genocide conspiracy theory.

    I made a good faith effort looking for something that disproves the existence of the internment camps at Xinjiang but all I’ve found is government officials either claiming they don’t exist or do exist and respect human rights or are like boarding schools. I lack faith in massive institutions making statements that are convenient for themselves, especially when they make contradictory statements.

    Yes the US is much worse. Yes capitalism is a sham. Yes racism is the single most evil and destructive idea in world history and must be dismantled. Yes the historical Dessalines was a hero.