• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle
  • The Nvidia driver doesn’t require rebuilding the kernel, just a kernel module.

    I certainly do hope they don’t end up with a solution that shuts out common kernel modules like Nvidia, VirtualBox or ZFS. There’s no way they’re gonna make an anti-cheat that blocks the Nvidia driver though, that wouldn’t make any sense.

    The bigger worry IMHO is around what distros it will work on. If they disallow user-compiled kernels, they’ll inherently have to only support specific distros (and derivatives which uses the same kernel), so I hope they’d allow all the common distros like Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch, OpenSUSE and derivatives of these. I don’t want to end up with these games being blocked by anti-cheat from working on anything but SteamOS and maybe Ubuntu.

    The best to hope for would probably be if they can design it so it works anything where Microsoft has provided a Secure Boot certificate, so it will work on any distro that currently supports Secure Boot.






  • Care to back that up? You wouldn’t need a license to do something that copyright laws already allow you to do on their own. For example, making additional copies for your own personal use is perfectly legal, if allowed depends on your local fair use or private copying exemption law (provided you do it without circumventing DRM, e.g. via the analog hole), even though of course the movie studio wouldn’t give you a license for that.

    Of course, DRM is the real issue here, as due to anti-circumvention the movie industry controls who can legally make players for movies on DVD/Blu-Ray (unlike on VHS and CD).

    You can’t rent your copy of Shrek out to people

    That’s literally how Netflix got started.









  • The problem is, YouTube has no real competition. No one has the same thing they do. And the same applies to a lot of things today.

    Another issue is, subscription services can just raise the price and then start charging people more without those people doing anything, or possibly even noticing, which differs from individual purchases where you had to make a judgement about the price each time. Now, people have to make an actively cancel in order to not agree to new prices (or EULA changes for that matter). It should really be the other way around, so that if a service raises their price, people have to actively agree to the new price in order for the service to keep charging them.

    Can’t speak for Uber Eats or Starbucks though.