You’ve shifted the problem of corruption from the cops to the programmers

Unless you make their code open source, but even then, there’s still a person/entity responsible for managing the code

Computers aren’t divorced from human biases. They do exactly what you’ve told them to do, even if you didn’t intend for the exact outcome.

There’s no “do the right thing” instruction. You have to mathematically define what “the right thing” is as a series of numerical instructions

Something needs to fill the role of civil protection services

Though, how to do that without encouraging corruption, i dunno

Is this legit?

Oh my lord it is

Hyperfocus does not allow for frivolities such as walking, peripheral vision, eating, or sleeping

Something about this composition is giving AI, but the line art says hand made…

Traced AI art, perhaps?

You know, you could just ask what that means

s/org/li means replace org with li

Nah, the Tylenol is what did me in

I did do the Nasty in the Pasty

AI slop

I can’t wait for all the new year’s resolutioners to show up at the gym so I can smash them

(Brazilian jiu jitsu)

Legend of Zelda: Majora’s Ocarina of Twilight

Nomtser?

LoZ: Twilight Majora’s Ocarina

Source code is just text with special grammar rules, that’s easy for a human to read and think about. But it’s not possible for a computer to execute source code directly.

So it’s run through a “compiler”, which takes the text and compiles it into binary machine code (x86 Assembly). This is what gets written to the CD and shipped

“decompilation” is the process of starting from the raw machine code, and trying to figure out what source code text could have generated that machine code.

Typically you use a tool that can do an initial decomp pass, but since it’s missing a lot of context, the resulting text is generally incomprehensible (and may not even fully compile). Variable x123ieh48hdc could be Link’s velocity, the currently loaded map, or it could be a temporary scratch variable

The real challenge to decomp is figuring out which incomprehensible variable and function names actually correspond to in-game

(Note, usually “100% decomp” means they’ve fully translated machine code to source code. But there may still be large parts of the source code that remain incomprehensible. Ocarina of Time decomp still has sections like this)

The reason this is exciting, is because the source code is much easier to modify. So having 100% of the game in source code means you can do fancy things like PC source ports (even if some of the code remains incomprehensible, though i imagine that makes it more difficult)

It’s not an exaggeration

They are selling user data for profit. It’s anonymized sure, but it’s still selling user data

https://youtu.be/4litc5DxoHQ

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/

TL;DR Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data”), and we don’t buy data about you. We changed our language because some jurisdictions define “sell” more broadly than most people would usually understand that word. Firefox has built-in privacy and security features, plus options that let you fine-tune your data settings.

https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b61939b7f4310eb80c5470e#diff-a24e74e4595fa85440a2f4e7e5dcfe68aba6e1e593aef05a2d35581a91423847R59

Removing “no we will never sell your data” from your Q/A page is not a good look

Servo and Ladybird are in the works. They’re both new browsers built from scratch, but they’re both largely still in alpha

Firefox is the biggest non-chromium browser competitor, and was an advocate of privacy and not selling user data

But they recently did a 180, started selling user data, and are now shoving FF full of AI bloatware nobody wants

So the userbase is feeling very betrayed

Null island?

I understand what you mean,

but it is technically the choice of the animal to eat more than they need on a regular basis