Yeah, at they approach 9999 surely they will start using larger variables to store the year, and all of the 2000’s code will have moved out of production (2000’s and not 1970’s because we may have fixed the 1970’s code by now.)

Insurance companies in Des Moines, Iowa, USA tended to be heavy users of COBOL near the year 2000. If you want a job writing COBOL, I suggest looking there. I am sure at this point they will do some training.

Um, the lesson was available, but not everyone is doing to reading.

Paraphrasing something a human said: With data and instructions mixed, there is no way to prevent an AI from following directions found in data. #Fuck if I know. Also, I am a real human, and this fits with my understanding of cybersecurity and why we don’t mix data with directions.

Great idea! Thanks for showing how to do it!

Hijacking your comment to remind others of https://noai.duckduckgo.com/ The more that is used, the faster DDG may remove AI from the main page. (Hopes and dreams…)

Anything to be cruel and avoid fixing real issues, like health care, child care, and wages.

The government death squads are coming regardless. People are dying in ICE custody.

Ah fuck, you are right.

I parsed it differently and changed the meaning of “dates” mid-sentence, which one shouldn’t do when reading.

They have been ripping people out of cars, leaving the cars running, once even in gear. Fuck these fuckers.

General Strike tomorrow in MN. Consider not shopping, going to school, or work tomorrow as well wherever you are.

I think they were implying you don’t have to pay for dates…

OP needs a new therapist using a different therapy style. Keep trying folks. (I have my favorites, but so does everyone.)

Not OP, but random human.

Glad you tried the “YOLO Wikipeida”, and are sharing that fact as it saves the rest of us time. :)

Edit: My initial reply was of poor quality. I skipped half of you thoughtful comment, AND I misunderstood your meaning as well. I apologize.

I think you are correct about your interpretation of their current policy. However, their old policy would have allowed for checking on users. The old policy is one reason my old company disallowed the usage of OpenAI, as corporate secrets could easily be gathered by OpenAI. (The paranoid among use suspected that was the reason for releasing such a buggy AI.)

I agree. I think training a depressing detector to flag problematic conversations for human review is a good idea.

Yes. Even if the government of the USA does nothing, there will be negative impacts. The population that survives may migrate north or south. Warlords will strike out for new territories. Anything still created or grown in the USA will no longer be. Billionaires will flee to the nicer parts of the world to repeat the process. Wealth in the American stock markets will do something.

Your family will end up doing most of the cleaning. Your landlord will hire low wage people to do any remaining.
Please reconsider.

Opens? OpenAI spent years doing exactly that. Though, apparently they almost three years ago.

https://www.maginative.com/article/openai-clarifies-its-data-privacy-practices-for-api-users/

Previously, data submitted through the API before March 1, 2023 could have been incorporated into model training. This is no longer the case since OpenAI implemented stricter data privacy policies.

Inputs and outputs to OpenAI’s API (directly via API call or via Playground) for model inference do not become part of the training data unless you explicitly opt in.

National Guard are still on standby.

Also, Jake Lang was run out of town. His march attracted like 9 people. What the fuck is USA Today doing normalizing that shit head?!

Thanks to Ars for including the lullaby. It is incredibly bleak.

Just to draw it out a little more.
A company intentionally made a product that is more than capable of killing its users. The company monitors the communications, and decides to not intervene. (Beats me how closely communications are monitored, but the company can and does close accounts as told in other articles.)
This communication went on for months or years. The company had more than enough time to act.
Sam Altman is a bad person for choosing not to.

Right on both accounts.