Mounting a successful invasion of a sovereign nation 101: Give the saner nations of the world the longest heads-up possible, so they can help your intended victim prepare.

BTDT. That’s my point. We’re all to blame, or no one is, because no-one will survive to be pointing fingers if no-one steps up.

Delusional? Wasting time being picky about who’s to blame before the crisis is resolved is delusional. We already know the solution involves killing or at least imprissoning a bunch of people, and who to go after first.

Again, do something or get out of the way. Wasting everyone’s time crying “why are you looking at ME like that!?” is a distraction we can’t afford.

They are still around to bitch about it. We haven’t failed them enough. FAIL HARDER!!

Do something about it or get out the way. Crying “why me though!?” is a distraction the real victims don’t need.

EDIT: Nice sidestep with “was”. You could do something useful today, or tomorrow. Instead, you’re here trying to shift blame that no-one was even pointing your way before you started preemptively whining.

Put me on the wall and shoot me all you like. Just make sure I’m surrounded by rich old people also getting shot. At this point, the fact the olds won’t volunteer to die or die doing something about it is plenty of reason to blame them also.

Future generations, the environment, and the guillotine factoy need the time and resources they will waste keeping my wrinkled ass alive more than they need the microseconds of sleep and comfort that killing me “should” cost them.

Crazy to game on anything you trust with important data in general. Same for internet browsing-in-general though. Good Luck.

This is pretty much me. More or less with consoles as-well.

Between this, and Macron towing the Trump line on Hormuz, I hope he remembers to mock them for constant surrender in his next rant. Y’all invented the guillotine, and now worship the oppressors. Gross.

It’s “parents” stole everyone’s work. The agency of AI-itself is still very much in-question.

The conversation in the comments was inspired by the comic. Y’all reached deep to confuse yourselves on that one, and ignore what’s right in front of you.

That special definition of “My country” where he means land he hasn’t even visitted in decades, if ever, but thinks he owns, and magically its all the people living there who have no rights to it.

They’ll toss them as soon as it returns “CITIZEN” on a brown-person they “just KNOW” is in the country illegally…

My first comment ended on the note that if you got your way, we would likely never interact again, and that that was fine by me. You didn’t have to treat this thread like your last chance to save my soul or sell me the latest from Amway global, but here we are.

I’m not here to apologize that some rosy cheeks and a linen-wrapped body that’s had its organs ripped-out doesn’t do it for either of us. Maybe move on with your day rather than literally chasing things to annoy and then claim you were the one being annoyed-by.

Attempted, sure, but it very much requires specific audiences to land. Did you think the word “delivers” was in there to look pretty?

Inspiring conversation and thought is far from “nothing else”. I thought I had implied this one delivers fuck-all in the way of “sexualization” unless one is desperate or aversive, but I guess I’ll make that statement explicit; It’s not sexy unless that’s what one is desperate to see or avoid.

I chuckled at this one for many reasons, not least of which because she would be dry, brittle, smelly, taste awful, voice probably horrifying, as well as delusional, dumb, or just inconsiderate to boot.

Whatever the case, not even a conversation first? On all but my worst days, I had more game than that, and could draw a mummy that doesn’t look like a water-filled baloon too, but sure, all that’s possibly going on with this one is innuendo.

I checked myself on the dude.

I thought the joke was that she forgot what Mummies do and made up something on the spot that just happens to suit her and her victim, this time.

EDIT: we don’t get the victim’s reaction. Not every dude’s a monster-fucker wannabe.

This is some of the most over-dressed, under-cleavaged-nippled-camel-toed-or-ass-hanging-out gooner-bait I’ve seen in a minute, but maybe the fact I can say that means you’re onto something.

It mostly amounts to you and I would be in seperate circles, but you do you.

Honestly, this exact scenario playing out with AI lovers of both anatomies and getting bad-enough that people decide learning to understand and put up with eachother’s non-sense is the better option … is the best chance our species has in this and future generations.

Otoh, we all know its mostly men, and this represents maybe a bottleneck we need to weed-out the ones that will never get the lesson. Here’s hoping there’s enough genetics in it at-play to actually eliminate a substantnal amount of the right(very specific levels/attributes of NP, gullibility and psychopathy) things, and not pointlessly cost our species a bunch of genetic diversity that could otherwise hang-around.

If that second paragraph seems harsh/eugenic, understand its the only potential possitive I see along this path, and almost certainly accidental if it works-out that way in the end at all. I believe anyone trying to make such happen on-purpose is insane and a bad person, promise.

More likely, our grand-kids will all be fucking robots until they die, and “their” kids won’t be so-much theirs as clones/test-tube-babies the robots raise, should they for some absurd reason deign to keep flesh-bags around at all.

Oh noes! People are incapable of adapting their aesthetics to changing bodies, how cruel! Someone tell my wife of 18 years before she finally listens when I say she doesn’t need to lose weight for my sake!

Seriously, are you so far up your own ass that you don’t think old couples fuck? Or just convinced those that do couldn’t possibly have loved eachother as much when they were younger?

Where did I say shit about “don’t settle for anything but top-shelf?” If women are the ones better at staying attracted to their partners, then what’s up with all the lesbian dead-bedrooms?

If anything, my advice about not settling was aimed at women, and to men not to settle for being settled-for. Not my fault if you waste your time fretting over all of the lonely or soon-to-be-deservedly-lonely people who don’t even enjoy their own company.

Or do you prefer everyone treat companionship as a means to an end?