• 6 Posts
  • 384 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle



  • Exactly, the dough alone is a whole job. I found other robots online that pull dough balls directly from a fridge and press them out, so those seem like they would save time.

    And those robots also put the pizza into the oven, remove it, and cut it.

    if you’re doing all three of those steps, dough, toppings and cooking, that would save some time.

    You do still need someone for prep, making the dough balls, cutting most ingredients, filling the various machines, etc. But those robots could be helpful at reducing labor costs. Could being the key word.

    If these things break I don’t know how long they take to fix. Sure people “break” too, but they’re easier to swap in.


  • Kindell previously used Picnic’s robots at T-Mobile Park, home of the Seattle Mariners, a baseball team.

    Usually, he’d need about 10 people to make pizza in such a setup. With the robots that number fell to just two.

    So I’m not familiar with the T-Mobile Park setup and I don’t know which specific robot they used, but I found a video demo of the Picnic robot. There is no way that system reduces the number of employees from 10 to 2.

    First off you don’t need 10 people to make a pizza. The robot does the “toppings” step, which is the easiest step. You know how I know it’s the easiest step? When you have kids pizza making parties guess which step the kids do? The toppings step.

    If he had said it takes 3 people to make a pizza and the robot brings it down to 2, or that the robot speeds up production by 30% or so, that’s believable.

    Also the pizza making machine is huge. You’re losing a whole prep area with that thing. If you’re only making pizza then maybe that’s ok, but most pizza places I’ve been too also make sandwiches or other things. A robot making things is a novelty so maybe if you plan a new restaurant with this specifically in mind you can justify the space, but I don’t see this fitting into an existing kitchen.


  • MimicJar@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneAdult Rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    When I was much younger my mother and sister were baking cookies. My mother removed some finished cookies from the oven and clearly instructed my sister "Do not touch, it’s very hot’ and my sister verbally acknowledged my mother’s warning.

    My mother turned her back for a moment to clean some dishes or something only to immediately hear my sister screaming. She had put her tounge on the hot pan trying to lick a cookie. Logically your tongue isn’t "touching ".

    This fool waited until they were an adult. My sister was way ahead.




  • So I was going to say that in general theaters won’t play films that are unrated or rated NC-17, although you might get a small independent theater to play an unrated film.

    However in article discussing the film Terrifier 3,

    Before the pandemic, few movie theaters would book a title that didn’t have a rating, because of strict limits on TV advertising, among other things. But times have changed, and Terrifier 3 was able to secure a berth in 2,513 cinemas.

    …had [Terrifier 3] been submitted, it risked receiving an NC-17 rating, meaning that no one 17 or younger could buy a ticket, period.

    theaters carrying the film, including the three biggest circuits (AMC, Cinemark and Regal), are treating Terrifier 3 as if it were an R-rated film

    So it sounds like an unrated film could play in a major theater. However the film Terrifier 3 is a horror film and likely has a lot of violence, which culturally speaking Americans are more ok with. Your example is around sex which Americans are usually more taboo about.

    Obviously it depends on the film, but I think if you made a film you think would get an NC-17 rating, you’d be better off releasing it as unrated and then trying to convince (major) theaters the film will be successful enough to make money in order to get it shown.


  • Spoilers for films plus episodes
    • Star Trek: The Motion Picture + S02E03 “The Changeling”, both have similar plots, an Earth space probe merges with an alien and causes problems.
    • Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan + S01E22 “Space Seed”, the episode introduces “Khan Noonien Singh” who is ultimately defeated. The “wrath” of Khan is his revenge film. Basically the film is a sequel to the episode.
    • Star Trek III: The Search for Spock + S02E01 “Amok Time”, the episode largely deals with Spock and Vulcan customs, the film has similar themes. It’s a weird pairing, but Amok Time is a famous episode. I suppose Kirk and Spock’s friendship is also a big theme in both.
    • Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home + S01E28 “The City on the Edge of Forever”, both plots deal with time travel.



  • It’s a companion piece or spiritual sequel.

    The first film, “The Social Network” was based on a book with the screenplay written by Aaron Sorkin, and directed by David Fincher.

    This film, “The Social Reckoning” is written by Aaron Sorkin as well as being directed by Aaron Sorkin.

    Can Aaron Sorkin write and direct a good film? Yes, he has in the past I would expect he has again.

    I expect what makes this less of a sequel is the focus. The first film was focused on Mark Zuckerberg the person. This film seems to be more focused on Facebook the company and the people involved in the 2021 leak.. Don’t get me wrong, Jeremy Strong us going to play an excellent lizard person Mark Zuckerberg, but compared to the last film it’s going to be a big jump in character.