Point 1 is assumptive, but not necessarily wrong. Social media companies have deep pockets, and these laws help them deflect responsibility for child abuse that occurs on their platforms.
Point 2 is well argued, but i’m not convinced it applies here. California could have the least harmful version of such a law, but it does not follow that those laws would be adopted more generally over something more harmful. Texas, New York, Illinois, and Florida are also very influential in the US as far as lawmaking goes
Point 3 is kind of a red herring fallacy.
Point 4 isn’t really argued at all. I don’t see how this fights fascism or how California’s law is explicitly immune from fascist abuse.
Point 5 is one that i can’t argue with due to lack of information. I acknowledge that abuse is happening every day on platforms like Roblox and Discord, but i’m not convinced that those platforms will actually have less abuse as a result of this law
Point 6 is addressing a fallacy. baseline shifting is a contextual phenomenon, and whether it applies here has little to do with the subject being discussed







IMO the biggest downside is that you need to use a Pixel: a $500-$900 phone with the build quality of a $200 phone. You can get them cheaper used or refurbished, but it’s still not the best value proposition.
Battery life and camera quality (no manual focus, no focus locking, autofocus is slow and inaccurate) are pretty bad. It’s also missing the physical slider for silent mode that many phones have. Also some usb-c aux adapters do not work. These problems are exactly the same in vanilla android as they are in Graphene OS, so the hardware is the weak link.
If you are happy with Android on a Pixel, you will be happy with GrapheneOS