But couldn’t they just be over-coordinating. That’s what it feels like.

Either way, I’m glad they came up with salt water systems. Much nicer.

Thank you. This sounds like the kind of useless knowledge I can use.

Man, spends his whole life starving to death.

I don’t know. Sounds kind of useful to me.

Ok, but why then when you open a bottle of bleach or container of chlorine pellets, does it smell like chlorine. Do they add the piss ahead of time?

Ummm, you might need to seek professional help. Like seriously.

It doesn’t sound like you’re getting it so I’ll spell it out. If you’re not actively thinking about or doing something for the next generation, why would you expect a boomer to have done so?

What?

I hope that’s a reference I’m not getting.

I find it interesting that, if their AI gets out of control, there’s nothing they can do about it, but if a USER of that AI gets out of control, there is something they can do about it…

Ok, but have you discussed this with your entire generation? You can’t do this alone.

Ok, but have you discussed this with your entire generation? You can’t do this alone.

I’m just making my way through the universe, like everyone else, including boomers. My point was that people seem to think that boomers, or any generation for that matter, have a big meeting and decide to fuck up the following generations en masse. I think oligarchs are causing the problems, not 70 year olds, who had the nerve to buy a house because they could. If you were a boomer I bet you wouldn’t have done anything different, because you would not have seen the harm in it. As always the harm comes from the top, not a whole generation.

Well some people seem to think that boomers were working for the next gen, or I guess against them.

Sure. There are always lots of great politicians to vote for. I can’t believe those boomers didn’t think of that.

Yeah, that should fix things.

Please tell me what you are doing for the generation behind you.

The X Files had an episode like that. It was pretty funny.

What I really want to know is, were the people putting out workslop, putting out anything better BEFORE AI. I mean, maybe they are just using a different tool to suck.

I think instead of stating that their performance was going to be measured by the quantitative measure of how much AI they used, instead of the qualitative measure of output, while making AI available to them, the CEO might have seen different results.

It’s almost like malicious compliance. “Hey everyone, do this.” Then they all do JUST that. What would you expect? LOL.

Isn’t it illegal to buy votes? Not that they would care.

Microsoft Word had been doing this for decades. In fact so does my ducking phone.