

mostly anything on windows
Computers and the internet gave you freedom. Trusted Computing would take your freedom.
Learn why: https://vimeo.com/5168045
mostly anything on windows
that can be done too. tarballed software normally doesn’t have permissions attached I think
but also the way it puts file data one after the other can be beneficial for compression, especially if you can define the order of the files somehow
there is. if the updater gui integrates with packagekit and systemd, it can start an offline update that reboots your system and installs the updates while nothing else is running.
kind of like on windows, except that this is one of the things where windows made the right call. complex software does not handle it well if its program libraries and assets are being replaced by newer ones that the running version cannot understand.
its still kind of a new thing, not all distros make use of it yet, but Fedora does, and it’s not a Fedora custom solution but something that most distros can have.
automatic filesystem snapshots and rollback can be integrated to this too, and then bye bye to updates breaking the whole system.
windows 10 works pretty well too. all things amazon work pretty well too. google’s services very rarely have bugs, even less security breaches. they are all so convenient! why are people switching to alternatives, that are sometimes worse, sometimes better?
Your argument in relation to GitHub does not take in the reality of the effort involved with migrating to a different platform, effort that is likely unpaid, has no logistical upside and stalls the development efforts of a project,
forgejo can automatically import issues, PRs, Wiki articles, and automatic pull/push mirrors can be set up to keep the repo up to date at other places.
the CI/CD system is almost the same.
all the usual features are the same or very similar, including the whole user interface.
not to mention breaking every single source code repository link across the wider internet, links that represent publicity and community engagement.
who said they need to delete the repo from github?
I think it’s admirable that a project is asking its community if it should stay or move
it indeed would be admirable if the communication did not contain offensive tones at multiple places.
and also don’t forget that they already migrated once. but in the meantime it seems they have gone back to github for reasons unknown to me.
I don’t think so. all user processes should be stopped in one way or another before the screen is turned off
monero does not, but it’s users do manually. at least not too long ago it was recommended in the community
but we do use self custody wallets, which is actually a good thing. and we do churn, because the anonymity set of the sender (right?) is pretty limited as of now. and churning is almost like mixing between wallets.
then your hashbangs are bad. isn’t their point to tell the kernel exactly which interpreter can process it correctly?
what did Monero do to prevent it?
not everybody can install custom roms, either for compatibility, app selfblocking, or tech literacy reasons, or that they can’t afford to tuse a possibly unstable system (stability often varies by device and update)
serverside checks neither on federated services, or anywhere where the user chooses their server
I do create a lot of duplicates as I move and transfer files between 3 laptops.
Consider using syncthing
for a privacy oriented phone you don’t need a very specific security chip that only a single pije of phones have. that’s maximalism.
Fairphone can do that too
and don’t forget that using encrypted messaging services is likely to be illegal soon in the EU
not everyone has nudes on their phones, not everyone will get to know that they are leaked, and afaik google hasn’t even leaked user images ever.
they. won’t. notice. it. they wouldn’t notice even if they were subjected to personalized pricing.
deleted by creator