• 0 Posts
  • 781 Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月15日

help-circle
  • I dont mean to say something that supports eugenics., because I don’t.

    Raising a child is way more complex than learning how to use a comupter. If a person has learning disabilities so severe that they cannot learn how to use a computer, then it would be wildly irresponsible for them to raise a child, because doing so is more complex. I am not saying that people with learning disabilities shouldn’t be allowed have children. That was never an argument.

    My whole point was that there is basically no excuse to not be tech savvy these days, except for an extreme case which is exempt from the argument.


  • Not everyone has the ability to be tech savvy.

    This is not true. Everyone has the ability to be tech savvy, except perhaps people with severe learning disabilities. Which, if that is the case, they shouldn’t be having children, thus making them irrelevant to this discussion. [EDIT: Apparently I have to edit this here because people are locking in on this singular sentence and misunderstanding this calling it an argument for eugencis. That is not the argument, and never was. My point was that it would be irresponsible to raise children if you cannot learn how to use a computer because raising a child is so much more complex. Thus “shouldn’t have children” in this context is the same as “shouldn’t cross the street” when a car is coming: you can, but it would be very irresponsible.]

    People have to care enough to actually try to learn. Learning tech is not difficult. But too many people don’t care enough to want to even try. Because trying takes effort, and people these days only do whatever is easiest.

    I mean, why actually parent your kid when you can sit them down in front of an iPad all day and make the government create laws that make businesses and schools responsible for raising them? Why take on the responsibility of your conscious choice to create a new human when you can just shove it all onto someone else who can take the blame when that inevitably fails? Kids take up your free time; why deal with that when you can drop them into the daycare called Roblox and then do whatever you actually wanted to do without needing to supervise your kid?

    Additionally, sometimes you can’t have a certain kind of parental control on something, thats true. The solution? Either the kid can use it while the parent actively watches them, or they aren’t allowed to use it at all. Kid is visiting webpages they aren’t supposed to? DNS block those sites. RaspberryPi community might even have something like a PiHole but for blocking outgoing network traffic to certain URLs, or maybe even a PiHole might work for that, IDK. Everything has a work around, but there are ways to make things difficult for someone that isn’t eventually going to end up a computer science major.




  • When it says a movie was “moved,” does that mean it was added as its own category separate from the franchise it belongs to?

    For example, the two Robotech movies. They belong to the Robotech IP, but they aren’t part of the show directly. Previously, Crunchyroll had them as a season labelled “Movies” under the show with each episode being each movie. That created a bit of confusion at first, but it did make finding movies connected to a series a bit easier by just finding the series and checking the seasons.

    What does this mean for that now? Is it easier or harder to navigate to the listed movies?








  • As for lip syncing, I have always thought that translation services, particularly for animated works, should be able to adjust the mouths of the characters for the purposes of adjusting lip syncing. Different languages have different cadence, speed, etc.

    You could just not care about lip sync, like old Godzilla and kung fu theater type films, but for animated works it seems like the editing would be pretty easy and minimally invasive. It could free up the lip syncing for more accurate translation. At the same time, the facial expression would still need to match the original intention of the character.

    I recently watched a series that used some kind of generative AI for lip syncing in the English dub, as the show was originally Japanese, but it was a live action show. In theory, this was a pretty good use of AI, at least to me, but in practice it ended up looking really weird because the mouth movements didn’t match exactly the voices AND the lighting was slightly different. It ended up being really distracting in the end. The technology isn’t really there yet for it to be convincing for live action, but I don’t see an issue for this for animated works.





  • Top 5 is too few, heres top 10 instead, in no order:

    Halo Combat Evolved (the original)

    The Legend of Zelda Ocarina of Time (the original)

    Silent Hill 2 (the original)

    The Girl Who Chants Love at the Bound of This World YU-NO (the original)

    Super Metroid

    Danganronpa 2: Goodbye Despair

    Super Mecha Champions (can’t play this one anymore and it is such a shame because the gameplay was so fun)

    Need for Speed Underground 2

    Elden Ring

    MechAssault


  • People, especially the Japanese players, wanted a sequel that continued the story of Harry Mason. That’s why Konami forced Team Silent to change Silent Hill 3 in order to incorporate all the elements to force a connection to Silent Hill 1. Silent Hill 2 had so many complaints about not being connected to Silent Hill 1 that it permanently disfigured Silent Hill 3.

    I guess back then we didn’t fully understand the concept of a sequel with a 2 in the title not directly continuing the story from the original. Whatever the case, the fact remains that Silent Hill 1 was immensely more popular than Silent Hill 2 for a good long while. It wasn’t until recently (maybe within the last 10 years or so) that Silent Hill 2 came into the spotlight.


  • I like Silent Hill 2 (the original, not the remake), and consider it the best Silent Hill game, but let’s not kid ourselves. It was only mildly received when it came out, getting an average score of 6 or 7 out of 10. It only very recently came into vogue.

    I loathe its ability to spawn the millions of YouTube video essays about it. This is the pain of a franchise you love going mainstream and then all the new people completely change it. Tale as old as time.

    Don’t let your hobbies go mainstream people. Its a two edged sword. Sure, you get more interest and more money into the sector, but it also permanently changes forever, and almost never for the better.