To my knowledge:
B2 is data storage, Backblaze Personal is a service. 2 Completely different things.
You can share albums with other users, or even with a public link.
That is not what i have asked.
I doubt that this applies to files smaller than the pack size or a for example bitwise unique 17MB file would result in a (overly simplified) 16 MB and a 1 MB chunk or am i wrong here?
I use B2 for my restic Backup. Currently i have about 100GB stored there and it says i have about 100,000 files stored.
With the adjusted calculation of the blog you posted for 10TB of 50KB files, adjusted to the mean file size of my restic repository 10 TB of 1MB files:
Transaction fees: 10,000,000 / 10,000 x $0.004 = $4
My Laptop has a mean file size of about 16 MB per file on the local restic repository.
EDIT: Forgot a resume, i do not think you need to worry about it too much. But maybe verify the amount and type of data you want to backup and use calculators to calculate the real cost, also you can always test it by creating a test dataset and then do a backup and recovery scenario and then use this to derive an estimate.
I think you heavily are misinterpreting the " The Distro does not matter" argument.
Usually ppl want a distro that “does x” and the answer will be “the distro does not matter, use the one that suits you the mkst”.
The argument “The disteo does not matter” does not come from the user preferences site of things but feom the technical " i want to video edit, “i want to game” etc.
So you say my personal preference and taste does not matter?
The point is, the amount of time and effort it takes to tune any distro to your personal preference.
There are distros that fit your needs out of the box and there are distros that need hours of setting up and tuning to fit them.
No but PoE and AP helps.
The point is, the anecdotal evidence that you mentioned has nothing to say about other points you are making.
Just because product X runs better in a use case with software Y, does not mean product X is bad.
I do not want to come across like a ubiquity fan boy, since i only use it very targeted privately but the stuff is good, it’s supported and a plug and play solution without the cloud. Exactly what fits the bill for what it’s asked for here.
It is run in operation by thousands of businesses. Does it have problems, sure, like every other brand.
Have run openWRT myself on one of the latest lite APs, was good. Have not noticed a significant difference in the usage between both.
First, I personally have not used it (but a security cam). But i have done some research.
Reolink Integration has Platinum Status on Home Assistant.
If you can set up Frigate then there seems to be 2 Way Voice Communication possible via the Home Assistant App.
There are a couple of Videos that show the process.
Reolink has at least one PoE Doorbell.
Switches, Security gear, nvr, central local management etc. not really something others can or do offer.
Ia it the best probably not but its still good well functioning equipment, for what it offers.
Just because something else works better, does not mean that it works not good.
Yes its expensive but also good gear mostly (never used the door bell myself).
PoE switch is not necessary, PoE injectors can be had for couple of bucks used.
I would go full IP. Solutions like Reolink or unifi exist that do not need the cloud.
Only challenge would be getting ethernet to the door.
But there are 2 wire to ethernet even with poe from unifi. https://eu.store.ui.com/eu/en/category/accessories-poe-power/products/uacc-retrofit-poe-2wire
Not sure if they work well, never uses them but i would try that.
EDIT: Typo
Yes, since with optimizations on OS level and with custom kernels you can pretty much tune it to any other result.
“History started yesterday” vibes. Nato had been amassing forces on their borders prior to the Russian invasion, and had already pushed east into former Warsaw pact territories after the dissolution of the Soviet union despite promises not to do so.
A ‘promise’ that has been debunked often enough. Used by the oppresor to justify his actions.
Also since Ukrain IS no part of the NATO it does even if it would be true, which it is not make even less justifications.
You make a pact and then leave something that important out of the official part? Common.
Tailscale controls the routing, thus the traffic. They control which keys get trusted. They most of the time distribute and develop the software.
It would be quite easy for them to start snooping on traffic, while on the internet anything basically is additional encrypted, that would not apply so broadly to the traffic that get sent via tailscale especially the self hosted crowd, a lot of that traffic would be http and unencrypted.
Just as much as Tailscale is self hosting.
So not at all?
Tailscale is just a Service. Not sure how you could even think calling Tailscale self hosting.
I think it’s not congruent with wanting to improve jellyfin if your reflex is immediately to say that nothing is truly secure.
At no point in life I said that.
Jellyfin has proven with the latest RCEs that they can handle relevant critical security vulnabilities.
As always, jellyfin does not have that much relevant contributers, and a lot of work has been done in recent time. It is very easy to lean back and say what they should or should not have been doing.
Breaking Clients would make the project not usable for many ppl or at least decrease the usability.
As i have already said, getting uodatea on those closed eco systems can be a nightmare.
I am saying all this because it’s more blown up than it is. I have said in basically every single post that it needs to be fixed right? So pls do not suggest that I do not want it to get better.
But, this link to the collection of vulnerabilities gets posted on every argument without any explanation and or classification. Which is also not ok.
It is always surprising to me that LEA can be competent and can work together internationally to take down really really bad crime like copyright infringement when big money is involved.
/s (not really)