I’m sorry brother

This isn’t how fucking markets work you God damn dweebs. Has nobody in Silicon Valley taken econ 101

I just sort of consider these “after-losses”, they’re the losses that come in the hours and days after a significant loss, the one we know and consider when we lost, “this time”.

We can both reset our clocks now I suppose, but in the end it will never be more accurate than “oh it’s been months” or “I haven’t thought of that in a long time”, “maybe a few years”, “nearly a decade”

So we can keep time from the date of the inciting incident I think

Once again, no. Your assumption is wrong

Removed by mod

That’s kinda nice honestly. I’ll keep playing for now though.

Just sort of, mental bookmark

I’m sorry brother

Well no, trust to. “More than” almost nothing isn’t too hard

Trust might not be the right word but, more predictable

I said lie to me you motherfucker

The point of learning long division is so you understand it. Once you understand it, THEN you can use the calculator.

Your entire argument is prefaced on the assumption that genAI is something that is actually useful.

The corollary of your luddite point is that EVERY SINGLE TECHNOLOGY is useful and groundbreaking and should be adopted.

That’s obviously not the case, lots of technologies are dead ends or can be accomplished much more efficiently with existing technology.

If genAI is a tool, can you tell me what exactly it is that it does?

I didn’t really say AI bad, though I think it is. But it’s objectively different. A calculator is designed so that when you punch in 2+2 it return 4 every single time, because that’s how it functions.

If you ask AI the same question twice you get 2 answers, different AIs give different responses, different prompts, different people, different geography.

It may be able to consistently regurgitate mostly correct answers to fairly uncontroversial common questions. Things we might call “facts”, things that largely have that information available freely in the world anyway.

As soon as we’re talking about subjectivity, writing essays and supporting arguments etc, you’re taking your life in your hands trusting AI with that kind of answer.

But largely this stuff is besides the point.

Removed by mod

Calculators give correct answers.

Oh they will win it for sure yah

They can, and they can try to make the case that this is unrelated to unionization and fight that in court. Good luck

I mean it absolutely is illegal to retaliate against unionizing workers by firing them, that’s why they didn’t say “we fired them because they unionized”. And Canada isn’t America, we don’t have right to work legislation and you can’t generally just fire people en masse without cause out of the blue

Please tell me this isn’t true. Lie to me if required. I can’t handle any more America. This may be the metaphorical straw

That’s great but we’re talking about Miranda rights and case law and all kinds of adjunct shit based around these ideas that formed the basis of what cops can do to you in custody like this, and they tell you explicitly “you have the right to remain silent”.

That’s not constitutional, that seems to be the police informing you of something that their processes and procedures say they have to do. You are told explicitly “YOU MAY NOW REMAIN SILENT” by the authority figure standing in front of you, not some abstract judge of an arcane document somewhere