“Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: […] like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.” —Jonathan Swift

  • 103 Posts
  • 938 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2024

help-circle

  • I can’t imagine how he’s going to get them to pay him more than what he paid.

    I have no idea why you’re citing “Section D”. Section D is about the limitations of the warranty/liability, and that clearly doesn’t apply (they offered Louis compensation for the warranty; both parties agree this is within the bounds of the warranty). Sections B, C, and D have been met because both parties agree they have been.

    The warranty (Section A) reads:

    Samsung will, at its option, either: (1) repair or replace the Product with new or refurbished Product of equal or greater capacity and functionality; or (2) refund the then current market value of the Product at the time the warranty claim is made to Samsung if Samsung is unable to repair or replace the Product.

    Samsung therefore has two options: 1) repair/replace the unit or 2) pay Louis the current market value. That’s not even slightly ambiguous. Even if you agree that “at its option” means that “unable to repair or replace the Product” is 100% up to Samsung regardless of its actual ability (which it appears to be), that still means they owe him current market value, which is in the ~$900 range – not what he paid for it. You’re way off-base with your assessment.

    (edit: “does not apply” was, I hope, clearly intended to mean “in reference to this conversation because the criteria have obviously been met”.)




  • I’d also add that the borrow checker, to me, has a grossly overexaggerated difficulty/annoyance. It follows a simple set of a few easily learned rules, and in my experience, if you break one, it’ll tell you which and where. I feel like the type of C/C++ programmers complaining about it are mostly the ones that have mountains of hidden memory etc. bugs in their C/C++ code that Rust actually makes them clean up.


    Edit: Another class I find are those who kind of just feel out the borrow checker blindly without sitting down for 20 minutes to learn how ownership works.


  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    shield
    MtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldthe witch and the hunters
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is more like a proper comic book format rather than a comic strip – where a comic strip is fairly short, this is dozens of panels long and is serialized from the similarly long previous episode. Still a cool comic, still a very based format (CC BY), and it seems like the first couple episodes are more like comic strips, so Pepper & Carrot itself isn’t the problem.

    Either way, seeing as I saw this way too late and it’s totally benign (just poorly fitting; I would try a proper comics/comic books community for future episodes if they’re like this), I’m leaving it up.

    TL;DR: Comic strips short; consider something that would reasonably fit in a newspaper alongside other similarly-sized comics.


  • “Takes seconds” seems like a strange experience. I remember OsmAnd years ago performed like that for me – clearly, painfully loading in the individual tiles. But nowdays, it smoothly transitions between LoD and has no problem smoothly scrubbing over e.g. a major city.

    I’m using offline vector maps, for context.


    Edit: Trying online tiles again, I’m assuming your problem can be resolved by switching to offline. You can have the offline data update automatically such that you don’t have to worry about it. CoMaps and Organic only use offline maps, which is why they’re similarly snappy to offline OsmAnd.

    This is under Configure Map > Map Source, and you only need to download for the region (usually e.g. a province) that you’re using.





  • OP, you might want to choose another medication. Xanax (alprazolam) is a benzo used in the treatment of severe anxiety and includes depression as a potential long-term side-effect. It can sometimes alleviate depression in the short-term, but this likely owes to anxiety’s close link with depression. The current evidence for its efficacy as an antidepressant is notably extremely poor:

    Alprazolam appears to reduce depressive symptoms more effectively than placebo and as effectively as tricyclic antidepressants. However, the studies included in the review were heterogeneous, of poor quality and only addressed short-term effects, thus limiting our confidence in the findings. Whilst the rate of all-cause withdrawals did not appear to differ between alprazolam and placebo, and withdrawals were less frequent in the alprazolam group than in any of the conventional antidepressants combined group, these findings should be interpreted with caution, given the dependency properties of benzodiazepines.

    As the Cochrane review notes, if you’re finding that benzodiazepine withdrawal is less frequent than that of traditional antidepressants, the existing body of data is heavily suspect.

    I only say this because there are less confusing choices of medication for the joke.



  • Formally on reddit?

    Yes. I even write semi-formally on Mastodon for PCSX2 (or wrote; on hiatus) within its constraints; a PR team attempting to apologize for something will normally resort to formality regardless of the forum.

    You’re giving off major “A 10-page essay before AI-assisted writing? As if!” vibes. I’m sorry basic PR etiquette is inconceivable to you personally. The Wendy’s Twitter account is that way if you want to soothe your preconceptions about PR on social media.