Here’s the study in Minerals. I’ll caution that it’s an MDPI journal, but it’s better than Earth.com’s content mill dogshit.

I think it can be pretty broadly said: “If you don’t like salad, you’re doing salad wrong.” Not because there’s a singular right way to do it but because there are so many variations that there’s definitely one out there for you.

So many people have, like, iceberg lettuce topped with a couple croutons and then either minimal dressing because it’s supposed to be “healthy” or a fuckton because the base salad is bland garbage. Thus it has terrible nutritional value, is ridiculously bland/one-note, and, if you’re the second type of dressing person, more or less acts as a conduit to putting salad dressing in your mouth.

It’s easy to make delicious salads – even strictly plant-based ones, but you really have a ton of options either way. That’s not to say “wow you’re so dumb that you can’t even figure out salad”; that’s to say “I’m so sorry you got mired in the stereotype of what a salad is.”

Don’t worry if some of these look bougie; they can pretty easily be unbougie-fied if they are.

How the shit is this supposed to be “programmer humor”? Comms really do return to the lowest common denominator if they aren’t actively moderated for relevance; jesus christ.

I didn’t provide the link because this is a world news community

Buddy, if you don’t feel it’s appropriate to provide the link to the thing you’ve screenshotted because it’s not relevant to a world news community, posting the screenshot isn’t relevant by that metric either. It’s either both or nothing. The answer in this case is obviously “nothing”, but at least consistency counts for something.

Not sure…

Bruh what do you mean? You a) didn’t even link the Wikipedia article so others could look (as though that’s even something that’s reasonable to make a post for here anyway), and b) whoever did this fucked up the formatting. It’s meant to say “* tentative”, but because “* [text here]” at the start of a line in wikitext produces a bullet point, it renders as that instead.

So you posted this here not even fully understanding what it was. Zero quality control on Lemmy’s current events comms.

We’re living in the Porky’s butthole timeline and we’re idealizing circa Gen X conservatives like this?

It’s a difficulty selection menu.

They ostensibly meant mW rather than “nm wavelength” based on the image, but they might not be the brightest laser in the activist’s pocket.

Edit:

Jason Bassler is co-founder of The Free Thought Project and has been featured in such publications as Rolling Stone, Reason, Infowars, RT, MIC and The Tom Woods Show.

Checks out.

OP isn’t evidently in a healthy state of mind. They just took down(?) a second NoStupidQuestions post stating they had an NDA keeping them from whistleblowing on crimes of the US federal government and needed advice.

(Means “long wings”, FYI; “penna” means “wing” in Latin.)

Indeed, and needs to be reserved for creating the next generation of hosts for the woke mind virus and/or being aborted (but it’s cool if they don’t want to; it’s their body).

The alleged Reddit reaction is the only one actually mirroring the virology community. Good job, Reddit amalgam someone made up.

I appreciate that the milking room is next to the vegan kitchen. Human breastmilk given with consent is vegan, so line up those Antifa milkers for a mouthwatering, very throwable milkshake.

OP, this article is from 20 September 2024.

Like that’s not a written rule here, but that seems like something you shouldn’t do given this is a news community.

My Mom’s a pediatric oncology nurse and she said

Dude, I’m sorry; it’s not the same thing. Virologists were freaking the fuck out about COVID-19. Your mom being qualified to nurse children with cancer does not qualify her literally at all to give a prediction on the virology of an emergent outbreak. You may as well have said she was a vet tech.

If you’d read it, you would know:

At this early stage of the investigation with limited available information, we consider everyone on the ship to be close contacts, due to the closed setting and shared social areas and activities, aligned with the precautionary principle.

If a cruise ship is close and personal, a fuselage is obviously close and personal. The virologists are taking this into account; you’re not going to have any considerations they haven’t already thought of with 1000x more expertise and scrutiny.

Care to share with the class? Is the Lügenpresse in the room with us right now? I just linked to “the press” who were pushing that WHO quote around.

you don’t have the ability to control what I chose to read, sorry.

What does the word “please” mean to you? It’s a well-informed suggestion, and you were always free to ignore it.

As for the quote “very complicated and required extended intimacy”, can you point me to where the WHO has said that regarding this outbreak? Neither your article nor mine says those exact words.

• I’m not saying that human-to-human transmission isn’t possible. The WHO has acknowledged the possibility.
• The point is that transmissibility is likely quite low, i.e. even if there’s human-to-human transmission, it’s unlikely to be severe.
• “Got infected” in this case is “suspected of being infected”; we don’t know yet.
• For your own health, please don’t read the New York Post. Anything worth reporting will have coverage in other, actually reliable, sources.

The idea of human-to-human transmission is not some kind of fringe media panic. The World Health Organization has acknowledged that it could be human-to-human.

“We do believe ‌that there may ⁠be some human-to-human transmission that’s happening among the really close contacts, the husband and wife, people who have shared cabins,” Maria Van Kerkhove, the director of epidemic and pandemic preparedness and prevention at the WHO, told reporters in Geneva.

It’s just that the spread would likely be limited, unlike COVID which is highly transmissible.