“Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: […] like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.” —Jonathan Swift

  • 89 Posts
  • 677 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2024

help-circle





  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldMtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldGood news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Yes, everyone hates them, they know everyone hates them (to the extent the community overwhelmingly supports banning the likely far-right artist they routinely post), they continue the behavior because it’s just in-bounds enough, and it single-handedly makes moderating here miserable. This is just one page of my reports across all communities:

    A string search for "felixcress" shows 20 matches.

    What I said to them was unrelated to the contents of their comment; I just haven’t interacted with them before and am really sick and tired of seeing them. That’s not professional as a moderator, so I’m sorry for the outburst.


  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldMtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldGood news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    No, I don’t want them to censor themselves re: this comment, and I’m sorry if I implied that. I actually hastily changed it from “everyone here hates you” to “everyone here wants you banned” because of Rule 1 (I’m not really used to that strict level of politesse in communities). I even said they didn’t do anything ban-worthy; if I thought their comment was violating a rule, I could’ve just removed it (it was, in fact; Rule 1 for calling vegans cultists, but I didn’t want that to be seen as a conflict of interest). I’m just kind of pissy since basically everyone in this community does hate them and they work just enough within the rules that my hands are tied. Literally dozens of reports for Jago, who, after some independent digging (I’d never heard of them until moderating here), likely is a far-right bigot.



  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldMtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldGood news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Like they do with unwanted pets, they’d slaughter the lot of them.

    This is oft-repeated anti-vegan propaganda, but it doesn’t tell the whole story. I’m sure I could have a prebaked, lengthy response for this if I wanted, but I’ll try to give you the bullet points (sources on request):

    • PETA is entirely open about its euthanization at their Virginia shelter. (Note: Do not click on that link unless you want to see some serious shit.)
    • The rate is so high because they take animals absolutely nobody else will. This especially includes so-called “unadoptable” animals that “no-kill” shelters can’t keep but don’t want to euthanize to preserve their squeeky-clean, bullshit, artificial “no-kill” status that makes them look good but doesn’t help the animals that need it. Unadoptable animals especially include the terminally ill as well as chronically, intractably, dangerously violent.
    • They also provide free euthanization to pet owners, where most clinics would charge a fee that many pet owners cannot afford (and thus will simply let their pets suffer until they die “naturally”).
    • Society creates this problem by adopting, not shopping shopping, not adopting (leading to excessive breeding), having extremely minimal protections for pets and requirements for pet ownership, failing to spay/neuter pets (a service PETA offers for free), treating pets as possessions (e.g. that you get somebody as a present), and so on in the ecosystem of an immensely profitable and deep-seated pet industry.
    • However, they do legitimately try to adopt out the few animals that get brought to them who are able to be adopted.

    TL;DR: PETA is not to blame for their rate of euthanization. Just because they take on the responsibility of the problem everyone around them created to ease the animals’ suffering doesn’t mean that they take on responsibility for creating the problem. The flak they get for this from animal agriculture propaganda is entirely created as a distraction to delegitimize vegans as evil, murderous monsters so omnivores don’t have to consider the unfathomable scale and depth of suffering they deliberately cause.



  • Ukraine’s prosecutor general, Ruslan Kravchenko, identified the shooter as a 58-year-old man from the Russian capital, Moscow, and said he had used an automatic weapon to carry out the fatal shooting.

    Interesting. If true, I wonder (read: speculate with absolutely no evidence; do not take this seriously) if he might’ve known somebody who died or was seriously wounded during Russia’s invasion. Could also just be fullthroated support of the invasion via outright terrorism.







  • It looks at a (very) quick glance like this is going to be a file that downloads from https://api.rpcs3.net/config/, not something shipped with RPCS3 by default like we ship the GameDB YAML file with PCSX2. Optional like ours.

    Aside: Shame to see RPCS3 still on Twitter. They’re a great team and deserve better than that. While I was away for a while, apparently a couple contributors decided to restart PCSX2’s Twitter (albeit automatically syndicated from our Mastodon and Bluesky), which I’m not especially happy about.


  • @dohpaz42@lemmy.world On the grounds that no moderator was here to listen to the will of the users and therefore (exceedingly likely, due to overwhelming backlash) make a rule against intentionally de-attributed comics, I would like to ask your permission to go back and remove Beep’s posts of de-attributed comics.

    I make a point not to apply rules ex post facto, but this is an extenuating circumstance where 1) there’s almost a 100% chance such a rule would’ve existed if the community had been moderated, 2) Beep was obviously, intentionally, and maliciously taking advantage of that fact, and 3) the posts are still intentionally harmful to artists as they stay up. I emphasize points 1 and 2 for why ex post facto removal is entirely fair in this case and point 3 for why it should be used. This isn’t an ad populum argument; I wouldn’t be doing this if I just thought it was the popular option. (See above.)