“Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: […] like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.” —Jonathan Swift


That’s because they’re calling you diabetic, which means you’re really sweet. ❤️
“Sentry online”
> “I REFUSE to speak their gibberish”
> Calling other people “indulging in the childish marketing of corporations” (a corporation which I imagine you’d have to eat at a decent bit to be this pissed over it; couldn’t say having eaten there like once when I was 7).
> Strawmanning those calling you out by insisting they’re doing the thing you profess not to with no evidence. (They might just ask for the fruit pancakes or whatever and not say the name but not make a big deal out of it.)
> Putting up a giant “OBEY” sign because other people think you’re acting like a clown.
No soapboxing here, nosiree.
Fun for them is probably being around someone who doesn’t get up on a soapbox to profess their refusal to say the menu names at a shitty breakfast food chain like they’re making some kind of outraged, principled stand.
Edit: Just want to point out the irony in eating at IHOP enough to have such a strong opinion on the menu names and then unironically calling other people obedient to corporations like IHOP because they think you’re acting obnoxious.


Getting Silent Hill vibes, and I can’t describe why.


Similar to representing an obviously guilty client in court.
y e s
It’s so much fun becoming an expert on random, shitty movies where the stakes are so low. Maybe you need to be a certain type; I don’t know.


All I know for sure is that Atlantis was in Iowa.


If you do, I could recommend a spicy but really unconventional twist on it. A lot of shitty movies like this have Wikipedia plot summaries that are lacking, inaccurate in small ways, etc. Watching it for the sake of reviewing and possibly revising that summary is a kind of perverse joy that feels impossible to sell to someone who’s never tried.
For example, I rewrote the summary for Whiteout (2009 film), and it was way more fun than just watching it straight. Noticing every stupid fucking detail and how hard it was to actually turn the bullshit plot into a coherent summary was enriching in a way that’s hard to describe.
Edit: Also want to add that this 1000% applies to shitty game plot summaries too.


Six feet under bricks
A fan whispers to a vent
Saddam’s hiding place
Hey, fuck you. Sometimes just commuting is a nice change of pace from my favorite game, Desert Bus.


Morpheus: Fucking bitch, I am gonna fuck your ass!
AROO, BROTHER, GET A MF’IN HOG IN THERE. CRANK THAT MF’ER ANY TIME A BROTHER STARTS THINKING UR FEMININE (not that there’s anything wrong with expressing femininity).
I need… you!


Thanks!


Hi, Picard. Per Rule 4, you’re supposed to either credit the original artist or at least attempt to determine who they are and disclaim as much if you can’t.
The signature is illegible and therefore does not properly identify the artist to most people.


All you are doing by deleting them is denying actual humans access to them.
Okay, and? Actual humans using Reddit still directly profits Reddit and reinforces its hegemony. OP is still making a small but direct impact regardless of how entitled you ostensibly feel to their work.
Baking is just DIY organic chemistry.
$19 right now. It says “7 billions dollars”, and there’s no real currency called billions dollars.
That part isn’t true whatsoever. Public domain doesn’t work like a poison pill. If I put the collected works of Arthur Conan Doyle on my website, that doesn’t mean the site can’t be CC BY-SA 4.0; it means someone is free to take that specific part without worrying about CC BY-SA 4.0.
Even for the slop code where it’s more mixed in, it’s on the person trying to take it to affirmatively show the part they’re taking was generated by an LLM, i.e. you can’t just say “this is slop, I’m taking this” and expect a project to have to affirmatively defend that it’s human-written.
And lastly, AI assistance doesn’t automatically even poison the code being created/changed with it. This one is murky, but so far, the general consensus is that so long as you, the human, worked on it – i.e. that you didn’t just let the slop machine run wild and take whatever it outputted without your own changes – it’s still your copyright.
—someone who doesn’t do slop