Not an oops! I just wanted to put it here for anyone else who was interested. Thanks for posting this; it’s really funny. :)

https://reductress.com/post/uh-oh-friend-clearly-not-the-victim-in-drama-being-described/

For context, though, they were trying to sell new toys and give an in-universe explanation. It wasn’t thoughtless, just severely miscalculated.

You could have asked me to fill in the missing steps you’re having trouble filling in…

Dude, come on, you say completely unsubstantiated bullshit on here all the time. It isn’t their job to ask you to explore your stupid, baseless, bullshit claim.

(In fact, you can’t see this right now because you’ve told me you’ve blocked me for calling you on your bullshit in the past. So I for example couldn’t ask if I wanted. lmao)

No, you don’t get it: they’re a Good Person.

Adding OpenRCT2, but I think most anyone who knows of OpenTTD knows of that.

A pair of pairs of scissors.

Poor pup knows their work is getting people sentenced through deliberately obscured trials and executed for drug trafficking charges.

Edit: Also, whatever AI upscaling was seemingly used here is really fucking up the text.

For some reason, I thought “Stupid.” was answering the headline for a second.

Allegedly, the way to access them is to enable a layer called “Quests”.

I’m really glad it’s useful to you, although I don’t think so; if this backwater, 30-upvote post squeezed their API, there’d be a serious problem.

It basically boils down to “do nothing”, right?

Sort of due to a flaw in the syntax; it (almost) boils down to an infinite loop (we’ll fix the syntax to specify “I wish for you to” and use the wish flags ‘!’ = opposite, ‘~’ = ignore/skip (we’ll assume this exhausts a wish still even though it shouldn’t since it doesn’t matter anyway), and for clarity, we’ll make ‘+’ mean no flags/execute normally; all 3 wishes are ‘+’ at the start of the first loop):

• “I wish for you to do the opposite of my next wish.” (flag set to do !wish2)
• “I wish for you not to fulfill my third wish.” (flag set for +wish3)
• “I wish for you to [have ignored] my first wish.” (now ~wish1 was set before you made wish 2; notably, this needs to be retroactive for the loop to start, so the syntax in the OP is wrong).

Now +wish2 was set. But then the flag for ~wish3 was set. But then +wish1 was set (i.e. it was never ignored; this is flawed, however, but author’s logic). Now !wish2 was set. Now ~wish3 was set. Etc.

Every even loop (0-indexed) will be (+, !, +) while every odd one will be (~, +, ~).

That said, a flaw in this logic is that it should actually stop after Loop 1, since wish3 is no longer an active wish; the genie doesn’t have to go back and change anything. You need the wish to be active, not ignored, to break the genie into an infinite loop.

“I wish for you to do the opposite of my first wish.” as wish3 should break 'em.

The escalator was just Gene Parmesan in disguise.

Here’s the Pew article instead of the journalistic swill Futurism publishes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXD9HnrNrvk

Heresy. There can be only one.

Maybe it’s like the “World’s Youngest Person” award that gets cycled through rapidly and is contingent on who last purchased the mug.

To that end, I suggest we serialize and globally synchronize them so people know the order in which “World’s Best Dad” was awarded.

“Well you don’t have to sell me on him that hard.”

mostly the younger brother and monkey scenes

Okay, but

Your p*rnography*, you f*cking p*rvert.