https://codeberg.org/tenacityteam/tenacity

Bro, you’re getting expelled if the Dean finds out about this.

> programmer

> humor

Congrats, OP, for not giving a single shit.

Personally, I think it’s for the better they remain separate projects for logistical reasons. I also understand why OHM went with CC0 for their license, and it was their (I think correct) choice to make it incompatible with the OSM one.

I know that’s vague, but mainly, I think OHM is better off not having to worry about OSM shenanigans, while OSM is better off being able not to have to worry about historic preservation.

Ah, you’re right. Brainfart. I forgot about that. I guess I can’t think of a way to contract it to a point then.

The hole through the center makes a hole around it inside the mug.

Yeah, the hole through the center is one hole (the “donut hole”). The handle is the other (the “handle hole”).

Topologically, the lip of the mug is a boundary, not a hole. This object is of genus 2 given it’s a 2-manifold.

Edit: The explanation below is the product of a brainfart.

But we can show this assuming the lip isn’t an abrupt boundary and that instead that the outer wall of the inner loop is part of the same side as the outside of the mug (i.e. that you can continuously walk on the surface from the outside past the lip without crossing an abrupt boundary, which more closely matches the physical reality of this mug).~

Watch this: imagine a loop around the hole of a donut. Now try to contract that loop down. Without cutting it, you can’t.

Now take a loop around the lip of this coffee mug. You can contract it to a point by bringing it all over the lip of the mug, then inside, along the outer walls, and then finally down to the bottom of the mug. It all meets up there. No hole. There’s the donut hole and the handle hole, but the colloquial “hole” is either a boundary if the lip is flat or not even a boundary if it continuously curves inward.

Dude, they would’ve had to write me out of the scene. As soon as Jim Rash drops “and all the black man gets is a plate of white lies”, I’m fucking gone.

Fun fact: you can see Gillian Jacobs (Britta) desperately trying (and failing) not to laugh in this Dean scene.

Topologically, that part is not a hole. The liquid basin not being a hole is where the joke in the OP originates, even: a standard coffee mug with a basin for coffee and a handle is homeomorphic (topologically equivalent) to a torus (a donut). And that’s because the handle is the hole, not the basin.

In the case of the OP, ignore the handle for a second just to simplify things. That’s a hollowed-out donut (torus) except that you’ve taken a part of that donut’s surface and cut it out. That area that’s been cut out isn’t topologically a hole; instead, you’ve just created a boundary on the 2-manifold (read: flexible surface).

Topology has rigorous, algebraic definitions under the hood, but that’s what’s going on in this picture topologically: you’ve taken a donut, glued it to another donut, and cut a “hole” (colloquial usage) in the double-donut’s surface, creating a boundary on the surface.

Edit: To hopefully justify this a bit intuitively for the standard coffee mug (not this abomination in the OP), the utilities problem is a classic toy problem in topology that

but

It’s a separate project with a separate license.

Okay, if a torus with a single patch of empty space on its surface is two holes, then this is three holes. But now I’m confused, because I don’t know if that’s true topologically. Otherwise, it’s just a two-torus with a perforation on its 2-surface.

Edit: I’ve been informed by a topologist friend that this has two holes and that the lip of the mug is just a boundary.

Edit 3: Ignore the case below if the lip is a smooth curve. I had a brainfart when thinking through the loop contraction.

Edit 2: So to clarify, that’s a boundary if the lip represents an abrupt transition to either side (i.e. if there’s no “curve” into and out of the mug).

Since that’s less realistic, let’s assume that you can smoothly walk from the interior surface of the mug to the exterior and show that it isn’t topologically a hole for that case either.

I’ve created a continuous loop around the two holes and the candidate “lip hole”. These loops are embedded in the surface of the mug. You can plainly see that you can’t contract the loop to a single point around the handle hole or the donut hole without crossing over the hole.

But now let’s take our blue loop (the lip loop) and trivially contract it down to a point.

1. Our loop is on the outside around the lip.

2. Take the loop inside of the lip since this is still a smooth, continous surface. The loop is now on the outer wall of the inner mug.

3. Now bring the loop down toward the bottom along the wall.

4. Contract the loop to a single point at the bottom.

In this case, it isn’t even a boundary anymore, and it provably isn’t a hole.

I’m hoping that we can skip spleens.

No. Do cool spleen facts. Link to medical research on the spleen. I want to learn more about the spleen; I want an expleenation.

But I’m hoping Dean Pelton stays a while.

(Also, OP, that is= URL parameter is just there for tracking.)

Mm, yeah, you’re right. I think tomorrow sounds like a good time to start.

We’d ask that you didn’t try. Directing your energy toward improving OSM in your area and moving people away from the corporations kowtowing to Trump and other fascists is what makes an actual difference.

OpenHistoricalMap tracks that sort of thing. OpenStreetMap is strictly for what’s currently (and at least semi-permanently) there. For businesses that just closed, it’s a good idea to put a note saying something like “Formerly Dairy Emporium” (along with potentially, say, when it closed if known). This not only potentially helps confused users, but it also helps other contributors who might try to “correct” what seems like a mistake.

Editing and changing the info is ideal, because it preserves the edit history. A deleted object is a lot harder to find the edit history of.

something something ask me literally anything about using or contributing to OpenStreetMap or about what it is/the state of it. get hyperspecific; see if I give a fuck.

Source: reasonably long-time user and contributor

When you wake up and realize you’ve ruined your life not in a way that’s acute, bombastic, and irreversible but in a way that’s chronic, corrosive, and less reversible by the day.

FYI, you can change what quests appear on StreetComplete (and their priority) at Settings > Quest selection and display order. As for contributing to hiking/biking trails and water sources, what you’re able to do is going to be pretty limited on StreetComplete. StreetComplete is there to fill in some data to existing objects.

That said, if there’s a type of quest that would fit StreetComplete but isn’t on there yet, they welcome requests.

Edit: I see the first part was already addressed in another comment. ^_^

Don’t go talkin’ ‘bout that dang ol’ orgy, man, tell you hwat, dang ol’ g-gross, man.

It’s fine to question it within the thread; the Wikipedia resource is a reference, not Gospel. The problem was that they were a) seemingly just spamming it, b) asserting “fake news”, and c) putting responsibility on OP to “verify” for no real reason.