“Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: […] like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.” —Jonathan Swift

  • 108 Posts
  • 1.06K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2024

help-circle

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonereddit comics
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    God bless Adam. He blew me away after he finally escaped from BuzzFeed. Not pure 10/10, but I thought for sure he was a hack; turns out he was really good and just pumping out empty garbage for a soulless job, which is understandable. (Edit: Exception is the Donut Day Loss parody; made while at BuzzFeed, and truly splendid.)


  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonereddit comics
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    #2 is definitely a nod to PizzaCake. The “NSFW somehow”, the expression on red guy’s face, the way neither of them talk like humans having a heated argument through any forum, the tired pandering accusation, the utter calm smugness from one side and utter derangement from the other, and the character design (no hair or glasses, but lanky, green t-shirt, grey-blue jeans, and similar skin tone; could heavily use gradients for better effect).








  • “US senator” is not an honorary title, it’s a job.

    What an odd response to calling out the fact that Josh Hawley cannot be trusted for even the most insignificant claim.

    You’re the one who decided to directly link to a press release from Hawley right as Trump and his gaggle of election deniers are trying to claim that the CCP rigged the 2020 election for Joe Biden; the least you can do is take some responsibility.

    You could’ve linked to The Guardian even to soften the blow, but you decided “Nah, Josh Hawley unfiltered is fine” and then got defensive about it.



  • Headline kinda missed the scale of this whole thing.

    It’s LLM-generated from some mill called UpWorthy; the fact it’s on Yahoo! News just lends it some credibility because most people aren’t going to understand that, while Yahoo! News has some original articles of its own, it’s primarily a news aggregator with minimal quality standards.

    Restoring the balance of these elements is not only critical to marine life, but human life as well. And we’re not just talking about food supply here. A lack of fish means a lack of income for fishermen, and higher prices at seafood restaurants. Dirty waters lead to a decline in tourism. Reefs even provide natural protection during coastal storms. It’s almost like every aspect of our lives is directly affected by the state of our environment. What a concept!

    OP genuinely doesn’t seem to give a shit about the quality of what they post; I administered the other day what I think has been the first temp ban of a poster from !leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world because they refused to learn when their posts got removed for clear lack of relevance.


    Edit: This article never once sources this information. The FDEP talks about using oysters but never says 500,000 tons, and all I can immediately find about that specific claim are some shitty AI videos from late 2025.


    Edit 2: But here’s a neat report! Again, though, the 500k number seems to have been pulled out of an AI hat.


  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldMtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldSelect Few
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    While we lack a rule against reposts and thus this isn’t a moderative action, I still have to say I’m a bit befuddled at the crosspost of a crosspost that leads back to a popular post from… this community three months ago.

    And that you’ve done this exact thing two times in the last two hours.



  • My first thought when reading your previous reply is that you’re someone who likes to argue for the sake of arguing.

    Bbbbbbbbbbb wrote: “I like plate customization, its a form of self expression.”

    GreenBeard responded to this totally innocuous, non-argumentative statement with: “That’s like embellishing a prison camp number with a fun design. That’s not self-expression that’s morbid.” Then went on to call the practice “gross” and “tacky” and the people who get custom plates under a “sad illusion” and “letting themselves be tricked”.

    Again, in response to just an extremely benign and normal statement: “I like plate customization, its a form of self expression.”

    Truly I’m the one who likes arguing for the sake of an argument here – not the person who started and perpetuated this abject, comically combative nonsense.



  • If you think the magnitude of information gained is even worth considering for either (or frankly any) party, you’re grossly misunderstanding the scale of the surveillance state or just have really terrible ideas for custom plates. Your plate is inherently already a 100% unique identifier; if you’re worried enough that like six characters of custom text or a chosen design will in any way further government or corporate surveillance, then – and I say this as someone who frequents privacy communities, hates defeatism, and thinks people (myself included) need better privacy hygiene – have fun pissing on a forest fire.


  • You think it’s snobby to not waste money on a stylized government ID?

    If you could read, you’d know I think that it’s fine one way or another and that what’s snobby is your obnoxious attitude toward people who do get one. The difference between you and I is that I see it as a waste of money for me and leave it at that because I don’t pretend to be superior and enlightened when my level of insight that the unwashed masses surely lack is “um, didn’t you know that license plates are tracking IDs?? by the government??? Fucking idiot, Sandra, with your stupid fucking ‘museums are for everyone’ plate with Snoopy on it.”


  • I don’t see the point in paying extra to have an ID on my car that tells The Man more about me than I think they need to know

    Literally what on Earth are you doing to your license plate that tells The Man more about you in a way that realistically matters? You don’t need your Ashley Madison credentials to create a custom plate.

    If you’re worried about dragnet surveillance, I guess it’ll help them when they divide the prison camps by baseball team. If you’re worried about automated surveillance like by ALPRs then, uh, pretty sure the model whose literal entire purpose is to create its own features for classification will find abundant other ways to uniquely fingerprint and extract actual, pertinent information about you. And if you’re worried about targeted surveillance by humans scrutinizing you down to what your custom plate says about you, then god help you, and viva México.


  • I’m just saying a licence plate is intended as a vehicle tracking ID

    Everyone here and everyone who gets them knows and understands that.

    I’m not saying we shouldn’t be registering cars

    I didn’t say or even imply you were, and the fact you clarified that anyway is bizarre – because it’d be completely batshit.

    letting them trick your brain into pretending that they belong to you and are an extension of your “self” by adding fancy designs is kind of gross.

    Brother, my god, it is a fucking identifier plate on your car; no one’s getting “tricked”, and I don’t know if you can believe this, but people can enjoy making objects into extensions of themselves without becoming slaves to The Man – if you can apprehend that someone in Kentucky who pays $25/year or some shit to signal that they’re into amateur radio isn’t offering up their soul in a plate-shaped vessel on the altar of Rebecca Goodman.

    Even if you want to bring ALPRs into this, custom plates existed long, long before we had the technology to turn plates into mass-surveillance tools.

    This is so goddamn snobby that it’s painful.