right, but that’s less of a problem

Right now in the US, the number of active LE officers is outnumbered 400 to 1. Meaning each police officer/FBI agent would have to keep an eye on 400 people at a time to get to the kind of surveillance state

that’s silly. nobody is watching your messages scroll by on a screen. its mostly automated.

They do monitor individual “Profiles” when they have justifiable reasons for it. Monitoring aprofile can include everything, phone monitoring, social media monitoring, physical monitoring. But again, you must have been cause of serious worry for them to start such investigations on you.

like being a “terrorist”: a peaceful protester for peace in Palestine. they are detaining people for attending those protests.

but we are still very very far for that Orwell’s 1984 type of surveillance, merely from a technology and capacity standpoint.

we already have the technological capacity.

well, for us

not yet, I guess it’ll take some time to arrive there

does not really matter when brakes are only activated electronically, sadly

Do you have a good reason to believe authorities might be monitoring your phone specifically out of the hundreds of millions of people the could pick from?

they don’t have to monitor any specific phone. that would be like, collecting the info but throwing away most of it. if they are doing something, they are monitoring at the provider level.

They don’t have the capacity to monitor every single phone or conversation.

it does not take much processing power to search in SMS messages as they are sent.

phone calls would be different, but unless it’s volte, processing is easier than transmission, because of the very low bitrate.

If you just go about your life minding your business

“minding your business” means not protesting to leave a foreign country in peace. from a point of view, it’s not our business.

Neither do cars.

did you try setting the default ACL on the shared directory?

section “OBJECT CREATION AND DEFAULT ACLs” here: https://linux.die.net/man/5/acl

I’m not quite sure about how does the inheritance of the default work though. but initially you will need to set the default ACL recursively, so that all existing directories will have the proper default ACL

maybe you don’t know but it’s not enough to start working on a solution when traditional cryptography has already failed. you have to start much much earlier, to have a solution much earlier. because most things encrypted one way will not be re-encrypted with new tech later, for various reasons.

You can call it hypocritical. It’s not. It’s pragmatic.

its not like you cannot obscure the unwanted cameras on your own vehicle

but muh convenience!! and you shouldn’t care about privacy either!

I know that not much prevents ai crawlers to collect all the content, but I think it is very different when an admin feeds data to it. partly because it’s a different legal situation (sadly that does not mean much)

this is flat out not ok, does not matter who is doing it. our instance ls should defederate all which do this.

I would opt out that’s no question, but I don’t believe it’s possible. GDPR does not matter here, as nothing can be proven unless the perpetrators give up themselves

I’m still pissed there is no way for a user to decide to open a shared folder to other users which enforces base permissions without root doing that.

can’t you?

you can assign a preexisting group to a folder as a secondary owner. or you can do it per-user with ACLs

if you are downloading the tools in every pipeline run, you are doing it wrong, wasting resources and time. tools should be baked into a new docker image that you use in the pipeline. another pipeline updates the image on schedule

woodpecker was an older system, it supports github actions workflows too

good to know @givesomefucks@lemmy.world that you can’t take your mistakes being pointed out. there goes the label.

pretty sure it’s an AI automated account. I had the feels when reading the “blabla: no X, no Y, no Z” listing, and when opened it all these separator lines and many headings made me confident.

cherry on top: it acknowledged your fixed link but did not update the post with it over half a day now

Because it’s not to “friends” it’s to people who already agree…

I was about OP sharing it with us, and we can share it with our offline friends.

thanks for the downvote. I could have stopped reading after the quote, and avoided all the beration. you must be a nice person in real life.

not so fast, many people genuinely think wechat and alipay would be an improvement