punished the users by having them install non-essential drivers manually?

If the drivers are being loaded by the monitor and not something like windows update, M$ has virtually no control over it.

the drivers are not loaded by the monitor. they are loaded by windows update. like when your motherboard loads bloatware into your windows install, that too is actually windows update doing it for the request of the motherboard. it would be pretty wild if peripherals could install random software without coordination of the OS

and what will handle the breaking changes? and the release verification? what will update the database and the operating system, especially across major versions?

Why would you, unless you are a member of Codeberg e.V. with voting rights?

because as a user I may be affected by the rule. if you want people to follow your rules, not just to punish selectively based on them, you let everyone affacted know that you made a rule. because otherwise people won’t know the rule, and won’t follow it. and then you are an asshole if you complain that people didn’t follow rules they didn’t know were made.

and unencrypted IP headers

and yet people even here don’t understand why it would be useful even without the hardware security thinhs of the pixel

and I routinely get key errors

did you try reporting them? they are watching for reports, and they are making automated tests for all cases they receive. you should probably both open an issue in the client repo, and then use the “report a problem” button in the client and paste the github issue link. before you send the report open the chat with the decryption error, or try to reproduce it with a new message if you can, so that they can get better logs. probably also toggle on the “contact me”.

if you get a new message that can’t be decrypted, send a report from the client soon. don’t need to open a different issue if you don’t want.

But it also requires a third party for push service

not necessarily, you can host ntfy or something else yourself too

molly has support for unifiedpush, the new messagd ping does not need togo through google. it also has better multi device support, and is available through f-droid with their own repo. location sharing uses osm instead of google maps, but of course signal users will still hand over your shared location data to google

tbh it already had automatization features

and that’s why you never ever use the latest tag, just below your comment: https://lemmy.ml/comment/26842059

and that’s why you never ever use the latest tag, just below your comment: https://lemmy.ml/comment/26842059

what do you use for recipes? plain files? grocy? something else?

same. these weird domains are intentionally filtered in DNS. open it with archive.today, that should work

despite the title its not only about AI.

before reading the blog post I was thinking the same. now I don’t.

the worst of the LLM projects have no place on codeberg that’s for sure, but there would have been better ways than a blanket ban to limit the resource consumption of LLM and crypto projects. codeberg already has a storage quota system, they could be giving a lower quota for LLM projects, maybe also disable free CI for them, which I am a bit surprised they have given. and solve the reputation problem with banners. but no, total blanket ban based on feelings, it is.

The decisions did go through Codeberg’s own Assembly 2026, which is more process than most platforms bother with, and yet as an ordinary user I found out about it the way probably most people else did, through a dark blue banner at the top of the site on the day it was already settled.

I did not even get to know about this that way. Only now, a month later from some backyard forum.

Whatever they get from those ads really can’t be worth that loss of customer good will, can it?

probably most people just silently accept it like good consumers.

did you try installing an old version of the app? or if it works through the network, maybe home assistant could help. but you probably checked that.

If you’ve uploaded a photo of yourself with PII data (eg. your name), then that information can be scraped and used by ethically void companies (most of them) to build a database with your information on it. All without your knowledge or consent.

that’s not what I debate, sorry. if you look at it that way, we all might have lost that battle, without exceptions, because of gov ID photos.

my point is that the battle is not lost by facial recognition companies getting your photo, but when your area uses cameras related to a facial recognition company, and your community cannot get rid of them.

some kind of wireguard proxy would be nice though to not expose my home IP address wherever I go (guest wifi networks)

package registry cache proxy

the term kind of makes sense but it sounds like they are just pumping buzzwords like a hollywood movie. just like the rest.