username checks out

so it must be a problem with your connector maybe

or with their programming language

its interesting when people seem to intentionally misunderstand statements.

I’m not a fan, but obviously, AI on the desktop is not about the CLI and bash, which are not the desktop.

I hope it will be that way. in the end it could be the incentive to improve accessibility and UI automation tools for wayland.

You’re right, you’re not going to achieve complete anonymity if you’re interacting with Google services in any way, but you can reduce the amount of information that they receive.

its not even about complete anonymity. google has zero business in when I’m logging into my utilities company account, or other semi-governmental portals!

I don’t think this is a problem. these data structures have become semi-standard,and they are working fibe, aren’t they? should they just change it for change’s sake, so that all clients and servers need to implement compatibility code? the problem with lemmy developers is not these standards they have created

“what are those? I only know duplavé.”

my voyager has counted badly few updoots to you for that!

deleted

rule 1

piefed is not a derivative. It’s not a fork. It’s a completely different project, in a very different programming language even.

neither does it implement specifically lemmy’s data structures. its not compatible with lemmy specifically. piefed implements activitypub, and is compatible with activitypub servers. activitypub is not lemmy.

https://web.archive.org/web/20201114190040/https://hfet.org/google-recaptcha-privacy-nightmare/

protonmail too

wasn’t there a DB conversion document?

Because it’s plausible to keep using it that way, and because they are protecting their asses

which means can change the DNS servers in the router for a mitm Attack if the default password hasn’t been changed (and nobody changes that)

or if the device can succesfully spoof DHCP offers. perhaps crashing the real one, or just being faster somehow

as an ad company they know that perfectly well

so, only the most expensive phones not even my small company will afford

right, but that’s less of a problem

Right now in the US, the number of active LE officers is outnumbered 400 to 1. Meaning each police officer/FBI agent would have to keep an eye on 400 people at a time to get to the kind of surveillance state

that’s silly. nobody is watching your messages scroll by on a screen. its mostly automated.

They do monitor individual “Profiles” when they have justifiable reasons for it. Monitoring aprofile can include everything, phone monitoring, social media monitoring, physical monitoring. But again, you must have been cause of serious worry for them to start such investigations on you.

like being a “terrorist”: a peaceful protester for peace in Palestine. they are detaining people for attending those protests.

but we are still very very far for that Orwell’s 1984 type of surveillance, merely from a technology and capacity standpoint.

we already have the technological capacity.

well, for us