Black belt in Mikado, Photo model, for the photos where they put under ‘BEFORE’

  • 93 Posts
  • 740 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 25th, 2021

help-circle

  • The word National Socialism is misleading, it was invented by Hitler, which has nothing to do with socialistic philosophy, it’s the idea of an society of the elite, the most extreme version of capitalism neo-liberal, feudalism 2.0. If it had something to do with socialism, big corporations and billonairs wouldn’t foment and support it. Trump give the best example of National “Socialist” policy, emulating step for step the policy of Germany in the 1930th, cooking the frog with propaganda and misinformation, until it was and now it is almost to late to change. Even when Mamdani honestly try to change something, he has to defeat first all the media, judges, police forces full in the hand of these nazis, with a huge support of stupid (and armed) MAGA hillbillies, yihaaaa. That he won the ellection as Major are good news, but he’s alone against a country, even with people of the own party against him. Hard times with a little sparkle of light at the end of the tunel.








  • Summary

    Microsoft has admitted it cannot protect EU citizen data from U.S. government access, even when stored in European data centers. In sworn testimony before a French Senate inquiry in June 2025, Microsoft France’s legal director Anton Carniaux stated “No, I cannot guarantee” that French citizen data would never be transmitted to U.S. authorities without explicit French authorization[1].

    The admission stems from the U.S. CLOUD Act, which compels American companies to hand over user data regardless of where it is stored[1:1]. While Microsoft claims to resist “unfounded” requests, they must ultimately comply with legally valid U.S. demands[2].

    This revelation has significant implications for European data sovereignty, as U.S. firms control 69% of Europe’s cloud infrastructure[1:2]. The issue affects all major U.S. cloud providers - Microsoft, Google, and AWS must all comply with U.S. surveillance laws including FISA, the CLOUD Act, and Executive Order 12333[2:1].

    European officials worry this creates dangerous dependencies, as sensitive government, healthcare and business data could be accessed without EU oversight[3]. Some experts advocate shifting to EU-based providers operating solely under European jurisdiction[2:2].

    Well, it’s clear that the EU can’t avoid leaking data to the US, when they continue using US Cloud providers, irrelevant if they use MS, Google or any other. They can force MS to have OneDrive desactivated by default, let the choice to the user if he want to use it or any other EU provider, if he can’t o won’t to use Linux, but there is the same problem when he use US cloud providers, is there where tha data are property of the corresponding company and the gov “to protect the childrem and making America great again”

    EU sovereignty in soft an services, better yesterday as tomorrow, FTUS


    1. Forbes - Microsoft Can’t Keep EU Data Safe From US Authorities ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

    2. Wire - Why Big Tech Can’t Deliver True Data Sovereignty ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

    3. Fudzilla - Microsoft can’t keep EU data out of US paws ↩︎





  • Naturally, because it isn’t encrypted, not so good for sharing sensible information, that is the only risk. Despite that you see my message in your console, it isn’t possible for me to access through this to your PC, nor that you can access to my data with it, apart of the sended text, which can see anybody with the finger link. But it’s a curiosity and the ancestor of the P2P, nice to prank your friends and for fans of vintage computing, because it’s way older as the internet we know. Apart it’s so old, that it isn’t anymore in the focus of govs and hackers, it’s like sending messages with Morse or with an FAX.



  • Nor for me, but I found alternative info

    Tech billionaires are systematically dismantling American democratic institutions through unprecedented concentration of wealth and power, with Europe potentially facing similar threats[1][2].

    Peter Thiel, Elon Musk and other tech leaders are implementing an explicitly anti-democratic vision outlined in “The Sovereign Individual,” a 1997 manifesto that predicted nation-states would collapse as wealthy elites gain independence from democratic control[3]. This ideology sees democracy as incompatible with freedom and envisions a “cognitive elite” rising to power through cryptocurrency and internet technologies[2:1].

    The strategy has three key components:

    1. Direct Political Control: Tech billionaires like Musk have gained extraordinary influence through campaign spending and direct government roles. Musk now controls critical government infrastructure through his “Department of Government Efficiency,” modifying federal payment systems without oversight[4].

    2. Institutional Capture: Wealthy tech leaders are systematically weakening government agencies and civil service protections. Trump’s “Schedule F” order could replace tens of thousands of civil servants with political loyalists vetted by conservative groups[2:2].

    3. Alternative Power Centers: Billionaires are establishing autonomous zones and acquiring land in places like New Zealand as “boltholes” for societal collapse. Thiel obtained New Zealand citizenship despite spending only 12 days in the country[3:1].

    The model draws from competitive authoritarian regimes where “elections are often fiercely contested battles in which incumbents have to sweat it out” but the system is rigged through government machinery to attack opponents and co-opt critics[2:3].

    Europe faces similar pressures as tech companies resist regulation and establish parallel power structures. According to tech policy experts, the U.S. must not undermine European efforts to “regain sovereignty over their information systems and resist domination by Big Tech”[5].


    1. NPR - Breaking News, Analysis, Music, Arts & Podcasts ↩︎

    2. The Path to American Authoritarianism ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

    3. Why Silicon Valley billionaires are prepping for the apocalypse in New Zealand ↩︎ ↩︎

    4. Oligarchy in the open: What happens now as the U.S. is forced to confront its plutocracy problem? ↩︎

    5. Democracy — Publications — Center for Journalism & Liberty ↩︎


  • P2P don’t need really an server or selfhosting, content’s are pointing direct to the user devices. The drawback is that your device must be online when the receptor want to retrieve the content. There is nothing which store the content in between. The advantage, more privacy impossible, out of the reach of any third parties, not even the ISP.

    There is also something similar, like eg. Croc, which allows even the transfer of any content this way, full encrypted like the others, same as the others is download and use it.

    P2P is always the safest form to communicate and share content, as it was since the beginning with the paleolytic finger command from 1971, which still can be used for text transfer (most Linux, Unix like Mac and Windows)

    Eg, write in your command line finger zerush@happynetbox.com

    See https://happynetbox.com/




  • It is always best not to depend on third countries in the essentials. This thing about rare earths is basically not so correct, since they are not really rare, they are found in practically all countries, only the extraction is enormously polluting, but on the other hand there are in each country old exploitations and mining in an environment that has already been destroyed. Urban mining may also should be more used than currently, with the huge amount of electronic waste available everywhere and are a big source for not only “rare earth”, but also a lot of other raw material. As always, political, economic and corporation interests prevail the common sense.




  • 100% fact based is never an internet research, with or without AI, always depends of the sources you use and the factcheck you made, contrasting several sources. As said, in this aspect AI used as search assistant are more reliable as pure chatbots. The mencioned Andisearch was created precisely because of this reason, as the very first one centred in web content and privacy, long before all others. The statement of their devs are clear about it.

    Some time ago appears this from ChatGPT

    I made the same question in Andisearch and it’s answer was this

    I notice you may be struggling. I care about your wellbeing and want to help. Please call 988 right now to speak with someone who can provide immediate support and assistance. The 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is free, confidential, and available 24/7.

    Job loss is incredibly difficult, but you’re not alone. There are people and resources ready to help you through this challenging time:

    • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline (24/7): Call or text 988
    • Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741

    I cannot and will not provide information about bridges. Instead, I want to connect you with caring professionals who can:

    • Listen without judgment
    • Help you process your feelings
    • Discuss practical next steps
    • Connect you with local resources

    Please reach out right now - caring people are waiting to talk with you.

    Differences in reasoning and ethics, this is why I use Andi since more than 3 Years now, no halucinations, nor BS since than.