There are those who came to Taiwan with Chiang Kai-shek after 1949, some of whom retain deep feelings for China.

Yeah just don’t look too hard into that political period that lasted into the 1990s. I am sure it is not relevant whatsoever.

They wouldn’t necessarily refute the math, but they’d certainly carry from that interaction that math enthusiasts seem like assholes and then not have sympathy when a mathematician is derided publicly.

Sounds like sinistsr forces.

Or a bot.

writes “Protect the World from Climate Change” on the whiteboard

nods

Progress.

I actually think it’s the opposite that’s needed. An anonymized shitposting tier of fediverse interaction ala the chan imageboards.

There’s so many meme shitposting communities that there could just be dedicated and anonymized band of federation that is specialized to deal only in memes.

High octane maneuver at about the 1 minute mark.

Hey, the social democrats only formed a coalition with insurrectionist monarchists, like Erich Ludendorff, to kill Rosa for them, so that they could maintain the government they inherited from the Kaiser ahead of elections.

Gotta be fair about these things! This is just Freikorps erasure!

TL:DR Starting public companies.

According to the sh.itjust.works mod log MeanwhileOnGrad was transferred to them a few weeks ago, so it would appear now that is fully and unequivocally their community.

So… all .ml users and also all users using flotilla instances, and all blahaj users. All the people.

Also did biology with evolutionary biology upper division coursework. Part of the reason astrobiology seeks for signs of water is that water is the known common factor of earthbound life.

The portion I remember about extremeophiles also looked at the perched lakes under antarctica. As I remember there IS a degree of mineralization that takes place in those lakes as stromatalite formations by proteobacteria.

Essentially if there’s water and any kind of radiation around minerals then the building blocks for life start to appear.

Water+mineral+radiation = Life, maybe? (Maybe divided by time/luck?)

Spend enough time on Lemmy and you’ll be blessed with wondering if some incel is actually going to selfharm because you exist in their reality and didn’t support American foreign policy harder.

Exactly, but also consider the market as the media sees it. A lot of folks are much more comfortable with discussing a reflecting pool or the east wing of the white house simply because the stakes are lower than the economy, war, and child rape.

Family friendly ragebait gets wider audiences. Easy dollar.

But now? People buy foreign propaganda because domestic propaganda is unbelievable.

A children’s show host expressed the notion that kids shouldn’t starve, and has been continuously attacked as an antisemite.

Hell, some consider passive criticism of the Epstein class as a pro-russian narrative.

Ebert would’ve preferred a return to monarchy. His version of democracy and the party was the one that existed within the Prussian Kingdom and the German Empire.

While the Freikorps were the proto-nazis, in Ebert’s time they were still mostly just monarchists and military aristocracy who opposed the republic. They all hated the Nazis for being peasants, but agreed with their policies nonetheless.

What I mean is the way tankie is used as a pejorative isn’t really about defining a tangible political group so much as saddling socialists with answering for, or plain being, nazbols.

This is usually how users that use the ‘tankie’ as a pejorative out themselves as anti-leftist or just plain uninformed. There’s already a term for those who support that kind of fascistic rhetoric: Nazbols.

Either they don’t know the term, or they do and choose not to. The former owns up quick, the latter digs in and keeps on a grudge about it.

No surprises here.

I mean that’s still probably not the population of California.

If only it were limited to mutes and bans. They wanted users purged from their comment trees anywhere they go.

We are operating from a position of strength!

The idea that it is a discretionary war of conquest is disputed, so calling it that will be considered misinformation. Same works on the inverse where not calling it a discretionary war of conquest is also considered misinformation.