• 0 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • I am indeed. I also never partook into this sort of approach, not being the « right kind » for this.

    I suspect you assume that I was « supporting » or otherwise lounging for this ? That’s not the case just to be clear.

    But it was happening, a lot, and I feel it is interesting to remember it to better appreciate how it is now.

    You assume so much about me that is actually very sad.

    As for how to converse with strangers you could go in a bar and raw start conversations…







  • And what I shared was based on my personal involvement on the topic. As I said somewhere in the thread my expertise is limited to one country in Europe so the legal framework is vastly different but the more human and technological considerations are likely very transferable. And indeed there are criteria for warrants but that would be subject to interpretation at all steps plus not everything goes via warrants. Judge being lenient isn’t also accounting for their own metrics and perspectives. And additionally a whole lot of my personal issues would be related to how data, even when acquired both legitimately and with some regard for ethics, is handled. And that needs to be addressed by police forces and their providers.









  • At the very least have controls in place ensuring disposal of data when court cases are fully processed to the full extent of appeals possibilities. Not allowing broad requests such as « everyone that connected to a given antenna for a month » or even « all connections toward NET or ASN whatever ». Additionally have the data fully isolated, removing all possibilities to cross use data initially granted for a purpose. I could go on for a while… It’s all a balance though, sometimes reuse leads to solving unrelated cases but it’s bound to the imperfections of local authorities everywhere one’s data can be requested.