Both because it’s more safe and secure. Plus I have very fond memories of LAN parties and without private servers and local multiplayer kids won’t be able to experience that :(
Both because it’s more safe and secure. Plus I have very fond memories of LAN parties and without private servers and local multiplayer kids won’t be able to experience that :(
Having the possibility to setup a server allowed me to setup one for my sons and I. I’d rather have that then them going online…


Yeaaahhhhhhhh


Cool this will only encourage Europe / China & other players to up their game…


Let’s wait to see the perfs? From my understanding of the specs I don’t regret building my new pc earlier this year.


I don’t doubt I’d get the brain to handle the load or die trying… Somehow the dedication in UO felt more rewarding than current systems. Lemme do 1000000 potions to level alchemy and bake 100000 breads… it was so open.


Ultimate online is still by far the game where I have my fondest memories. I could really go for another round of that…


Crazy to see that you feel the need to downvote my answer…


I have two… I kind of see… I’m not claiming expertise but « matey » isn’t on his first trip…


YouTube too? There’s an abundance of tutorials over there…


Why aren’t you parenting them on this topic then? Beside the parenting bits you can also put in place technical measures to filter out what they can access… reasonably so. And when they break out of those controls it also means that they are smart enough to take on the internet anyway.


Emphasis on age verification companies and other beneficiaries…


Not even a commission (which would be governmental), it’s purely litigational… See my other comment on who is behind it…


Indeed.
From their page (https://www.winward.uk/about) they are funded by Rocade Capital. Rocade Capital itself links to EJF Capital and Barings.
It all could be unethical gambling based on the last Epics shenanigans… Maybe the chances to get a jugement favouring them is now statistically higher than against them.


I’m curious who’s bankrolling them for this one.
They are not the same as Noyb who actually are very transparent and actually « believe » in something : these dudes are closer to insurance claims chasers from what I read about them.
Also I love their Q&A that states that they don’t get money from this
No. The Consumenten Competition Claims Foundation is a non-profit foundation.
Someone is absolutely paying them for the action it’s literally 5 questions above and is Winward NL. And they go back to my ambulance chaser parallel since it’s just a company doing litigation finance.
There’s nothing showing links from those guys to broader financial interests but that would not be out of the possibilities.


As much as I love my EV I’ll keep my horse au naturel…


I had more fun opening loot boxes than using AI at work though


Just ask for the customer’s first born at this stage…


Beside the « personal tasks » or generally any personal data that might be processed locally by performing those - which are likely allowed to a certain extent by internal policies in large companies - the behaviour determination by keystroke / microphone / camera analysis is a privacy concern whatever data is involved.
It’s a level of surveillance that goes way to far. This is indeed a step too far.
Hold on a minute… the field of AI and in general algorithms and models is quite old. LLM is relatively new in there. For science and healthcare we’ve been using specialist ai for a long while for things like image processing, sequencing and what’s not. Those are absolutely monitored have have generally high standards because they are healthcare related already. Don’t mix those things.